[ad_1]
However, this relationship had begun to appear publicly more than a year ago, especially after the appointment of the Yemeni ambassador, Ibrahim Al-Dailami, in Tehran, last year, to demonstrate the involvement of the two capitals in the framework of a unique alliance to face the American-Israeli project in the region. In 2014, the two countries signed dozens of economic and development agreements, but the aggression against Yemen prevented their implementation, while the two sides now confirm that they will be reactivated if the war ceases, that Iran is committed to contributing to the reconstruction of what Has destroyed.
Saudi Arabia launched its war against Yemen under the pretext of the country’s association with Iran and under another pretext: to return to Sanaa the so-called “legitimacy” represented by the outgoing president, Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi. After almost six years of aggression, the political path is still interrupted, while there is no indication that the end of the war is near. The paradox, here, is that Saudi Arabia, which claims that 85% of Yemeni lands are under its control and the control of its agents, is fulfilling its ambassador to Yemen, Muhammad Al Jaber, his work from Riyadh, while the Iranian ambassador in Sanaa, where he began his work from him, has been described as “A painful blow to the Saudi-Emirati coalition.
However, the path that Earlo took to the Yemeni capital is still shrouded in many ambiguities, as questions have been raised about how he got there and whether this was under an agreement with one of the countries that supports the “coalition”. at the expense of Saudi Arabia, whose position seemed shameful and shameful, or if Riyadh’s position in Yemen has become so fragile that it is unable to prevent the entry of the Iranian ambassador, despite its full control of Yemeni airspace, and of all flights arriving at the Sanaa International Airport, which previously obtained permits from the leaders of the “coalition”? In the same context, high-level figures from the so-called “legitimacy”, specifically from the “reformist” wing (the Brotherhood) loyal to Qatar, raised questions about Saudi Arabia’s relationship with the matter, accusing it of coordinating with the Iranian side to handing over the ambassador to Sana’a, as part of a greater understanding to end the war, Inferring what has been mentioned above are many preliminary political, humanitarian and economic steps, including the exchange of prisoners.
As for the other paradox, in this context, it is that Saudi Arabia, which launched the war under the pretext of restoring “legitimacy” to Sanaa, cannot return Hadi to Aden, the economic capital of Yemen, which has been called ” liberated “since the summer of 2015. In fact, the Saudi regime has failed to manage the lower levels of authority in the so-called” liberated governorates “, as is the case of the Aden Security Administration, where until now Riyadh has not been able to make a handover between the former security director, Major General Shalal Ali Shaya, who is loyal to the United Arab Emirates, and the new director appointed by a presidential decree four months ago. Major General Ahmed Muhammad al-Hamidi, loyal to Hadi. It is worth noting here that Shaya and Al-Hamdi are in Riyadh on a visit to resolve the issue between them, but the Saudi efforts have not yet achieved the desired result.
There is talk that many countries are considering opening diplomatic missions and consulates in Sana’a
For his part, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Salvation Government, Hisham Sharaf, commented in a television interview about the return of the Iranian ambassador, saying that his arrival has nothing to do with regional conflicts, but is “a declaration of solidarity Iranian with the Yemeni people who have been attacked for years. ” On that, Yemen still exists and has friends in the world. “Sharaf called on the countries of the world to reconsider their accounts, because” whoever comes to us while we face aggression is not like someone who is late. “In this context, it is spoken that many countries are considering opening diplomatic missions and consulates in Sana’a, and that is what Sharaf hinted, when speaking of “very big surprises that will appear soon.”
In a parallel vein, activists considered the arrival of the Iranian ambassador to Sana’a as proof of the failure of the “coalition” to achieve its objectives after 6 years of war in which it destroyed Yemen’s capabilities and infrastructure, while the Government of Salvation preserved government institutions as a permanent state that lacks only world recognition, and publicly, as Iran did.
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
