[ad_1]
However, there is a quirk in the recent study, which was based on research conducted between August 12 and September 8, 2020; Because it coincided with the peak of the Gulf’s push towards normalization, which means that the two parties, supporters and opponents, were at the height of interaction over this event. However, the messages contained in the results of the study go beyond the Gulf event, to be an indication of the orientations of Arab public opinion towards the entire normalization movement, and a catalyst to anticipate the dangers known to the entity. enemy and those who are typified with it, and evidence of all that they have accumulated since the Camp Accord. David ‘in 1978, through the “Oslo and Wadi Araba accords”, which led to the recent accords, could collapse on any subsequent expiration. The recent study is part of a new initiative led by the Minister of Strategic Affairs, Uriet Farkash HaCohen, which “aims to address negative public opinion about Israel, especially over the Internet,” which means that it is part of the ” battle of conscience “through which the enemy entity targets the Arab street.
In 2015, the Cabinet decided to put the task of working against what is called in Israeli literature “delegitimizing the State of Israel” and the BDS movement on the shoulders of the Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Propaganda. In this context, the Ministry is in charge of coordinating government efforts in the “battle of conscience”, in all its promotional, academic, economic, cultural and legal dimensions, and then submits a periodic evaluation to the competent authorities. The standardization study is part of the attempt by Minister Farkash HaCohen, who will soon end her term and move to the Ministry of Tourism, to change the essence of the ministry’s work, to move towards monitoring how Israel treats social media, assuming that an important part of the discussion takes place there.
Most of the hypothetical Arab discussions expressed “negative sentiments” towards normalization.
Regarding the content of the study, it showed that “much of the negative discourse included a strong condemnation of the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, with accusations of betraying the Palestinians and flattering Israel and the United States,” explaining that these results came despite that the governments of Abu Dhabi and Manama made great efforts on social media. To justify his options: “a religious discourse aimed at defending the legal dimension of the agreements, highlighting the economic and political benefit, and the abolition of the annexation plan by the Israeli government.” The study, which addressed Arab discussions on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube about the UAE and Bahrain accords prior to their signing at the White House, showed that the overwhelming majority (90%) expressed “negative feelings” towards standardization. Unlike only 5%, they showed a “positive” attitude and their posts contained the word “peace”. Negative attitudes were distributed as follows: 45% focused on accusing the UAE of betraying the Palestinians, 27% on opposing the agreements with the Zionists, 10% on the fact that the agreement is hypocritical from the UAE, 5% surrendering to the United States and 4% expressing greed Over 100 million users have seen prominent hashtags such as “#Normalization is treason” and “#Bahrainis against normalization”. On the other hand, the opinions of supporters were divided as to whether normalization has security benefits (61%), economic viability (33%) or whether it is whitewashing an existing situation (6%). In an attempt to explain the failure of the attempt to promote normalization on social media, the study attributed “negative” posts to Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, as well as to “a group of civil society organizations that are promoting the delegitimization of Israel “.
In the recommendations, the study called for a counter “battle of conscience,” during which the focus would be on Arabic-language social media, particularly in the Gulf states and other countries with which other agreements could be signed. He stressed the need to focus on the benefits inherent in the normalization steps for the normalized state. For her part, the Minister of Social Affairs recommended monitoring anti-Israel activity on social networks, since the latter represent “an important platform for shaping public opinion.” He said: “Given the critical importance of normalization processes for the future of the Middle East, and in light of the hate speech attack against our recent Gulf associations, we will work to advance a long-term positive awareness process in the language. Arab presenting the benefits of peace. ” This means that the next stage will see an escalation in incitement and smear campaigns against the resistance forces, and the commercialization of the supposed benefits of “peace”, with the aim of producing an Arab public opinion in support of This process.
As a result, it can be said that the evaluation and decision-making apparatus in Tel Aviv received a great impact, not only because of the results of the study, nor because of the fact that it was as a result of organized campaigns launched by the parties that support the normalization, but rather because of the fact that it also comes after all the wars, harassment and destruction that the region has gone through. And campaigns of incitement, distortion and despair, indicating that the position of rejection of the Zionist occupation of Palestine still occupies the consciousness of the Arab street. From here, it becomes understandable that the head of the investigation department of the Military Intelligence Division “Aman”, Brigadier General Dror Shalom, in an interview with the newspaper “Yediot Aharonot” a few days ago (9/6 / 2020), commenting on the results of the study, that “it is forbidden to think that the scientist The Arab suddenly ignores the Palestinian problem”, admitting that “this problem is here at our doorstep like a time bomb.
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
