[ad_1]
The political forces were not expecting all the attack from former Prime Minister Saad Hariri. He only knew that he suddenly decided to star in a television interview for an unknown reason: Who made him speak? Why did he attack all political forces without exception? Why was there unprecedented sharpness in the leadership of the Speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berri?
If Hariri is looking to return to the Serail again, and he expressed his intention to translate this goal by describing himself as a natural candidate for prime minister, then why did he throw all his arrows at once at the forces that are supposed to name him? ?
It is not enough to depend on the votes of his parliamentary bloc that could be a base for him, or of another party, such as the “Hezbollah” and “Amal” movement, although the aforementioned duo were the most targeted of the former prime minister’s arrows. . Hariri cannot rely solely on Arab, regional or international capitals, some of which are said, particularly Riyadh, to place a “veto” on his assumption of the presidency of a government in the current presidential era that includes Hezbollah. This is what led the powers concerned to brainstorm among themselves on the basis of: Hariri does not believe that external approval will lead him to the Grand Serail without our consent. The former prime minister may have obtained approval from Saudi Arabia or the United States to proceed with his candidacy for the presidency of the Lebanese government, causing him to change his words from: “I will not lead a government during this era” to: “I am a natural candidate for prime minister. ” But the expression is lax, so it can be overruled if the parliamentary blocs did not name it, saying: I did not announce my candidacy now, but my natural candidacy as former prime minister and leader of a Sunni political movement and head of the largest Sunni parliamentary bloc. . Thus, Hariri’s words were based on the fact that no one was blessing him, not an ally or an opponent.
Was Hariri a mistake to raise the roof? Certainly, the objective was not to enter into negotiations at the highest levels of discourse internally. Insiders say the head of the Future Movement was practically targeting the Saudis by showing resentment against Hezbollah and through its attacks on the Free Patriotic Movement, and emulating the Lebanese street by throwing responsibility balls in other stadiums. But what is striking is his correction on Berri when unpacking the latter’s achievement of the framework agreement on the demarcation of the southern borders. Although Berri offered him “sparrow milk”, he was not grateful for Ain al-Tina. He said it frankly and suddenly. Is there anyone who has pushed you to attack the speaker of parliament in this sense? Perhaps the convergence of the path between the duo “Amal” and “Hezbollah” was a motive for Hariri that he could include Berri in his campaign. Here, his attack on the Shiite majority takes on several dimensions: the mobilization of the Sunni street behind him. Deal with Western and Arab pressures on Shiites in Lebanon. Trying to say that our effort to distinguish between “Amal” and “Hezbollah” has not paid off politically lately.
It was also notable that Hariri tried to lure the head of the “Free Patriot”, MP Gebran Bassil, by asking him to determine his choice. This means that the words of the former prime minister have another dimension related to the existing regional localities.
Hariri can destroy every sentence classified as negative through the communications he initiates. If the prime minister raises the roof with the aim of harvesting Sunni and “revolutionary” populism, to cover his descent from the tree of not running for prime minister in the current era, then the answer will be with him to chart the path of the future government. . If he limits himself to keeping up with the needs of foreign capital, his path will increase the country’s crisis without solutions or agreements. And if his positions were aimed at blocking potential candidates to head the government, like Najib Mikati, whose initiative was effectively overthrown by Hariri, he confirmed the equation: there is no prime minister but Saad. In the event that a consensus is not reached, the crisis will expand. Here, the negative economic consequences or repercussions will not be far from Hariri’s own responsibility. A former prime minister and leader of a movement that has been running the country politically and financially for decades cannot shirk two of his responsibilities in a long government.
Consequently, the “Forces” party was the first to dare to respond clearly to Hariri, which means that “forces” chief Samir Geagea did not change his position regarding not appointing Hariri as prime minister. If the position of the “Free Patriotic Movement” were similar, it would have ended its efforts to return to the Great Serail. On the other hand, the two movements “Hezbollah” and “Amal” preferred silence and anticipation under the title: they carefully and accurately assessed Hariri’s position, in light of their clear annoyance with him. The information speaks that the aforementioned duo will not name him if he does not call him a “free patriot”, because it makes no sense to name an unproductive who gives him the fruitless and unworthy after the attack on the duo. Is the ball now in Basil’s court? Was this a reason for the caress that was noted in Hariri’s speech about the leader of the “Free Patriot”?
[ad_2]
