[ad_1]
A new report from UK lawmakers claims there is clear evidence of collusion between Huawei and the Communist Party of China.
British MPs are also proposing the possibility of removing the Chinese telecommunications giant’s equipment from the country’s networks earlier than originally planned.
These new British remarks add pressure on Huawei, which has been vetoed in major markets, such as Australia and Japan, as it faces a series of sanctions from Washington aimed at keeping it away from key technologies such as chips.
Huawei responded to the report saying: This report lacks credibility because it is based on opinion rather than fact, and we are confident that people will not believe these false allegations of collusion and will instead remember what Huawei has provided to Britain over the past 20 years.
The UK government announced in July that the country’s telecommunications companies should stop buying Huawei equipment by the end of this year, and should also remove Huawei equipment from their infrastructure by 2027.
The decision was the result of an emergency review of Huawei by the UK’s National Cybersecurity Center, shortly after the US imposed new sanctions on the Chinese giant that prevented it from supplying significant supplies of semiconductors.
A separate investigation by the British Parliament’s Defense Committee on the security of 5G networks in the UK said: The timetable for 2027 to remove Huawei equipment from networks is reasonable, and the timetable for 2025 could be considered in specific circumstances. .
Lawmakers said the government should consider retiring the equipment and making it economically viable by 2025. In the event that pressure from allies continues or if threats from China change, the global position will be highly justified.
The lawmakers added: These restrictions are clearly delaying the rollout of the 5G network and inflicting economic damage on the UK and telcos. The government should take steps to reduce delays and economic damage and consider offering compensation to telcos if the 2027 deadline is brought forward.
Lawmakers addressed a number of points raised by those who testified In the parliamentary inquiry that concluded that concern about Huawei was based on clear evidence of collusion between the company and the Communist Party of China apparatus.
The UK’s National Cybersecurity Center said earlier this year: Huawei is a high-risk seller because it is a Chinese company and under China’s National Intelligence Act 2017, it could be required to act in a way that harm the UK.
It seems that Chinese companies are bound by this law to cooperate with state intelligence, and that may mean handing over data to Beijing, andHuawei has denied that it ever does.
Andre Pienaar, founder of C5 Capital, said that the Chinese government helped finance Huawei.
In an article published in December, the Wall Street Journal detailed how Huawei received nearly $ 75 billion in loans, lines of credit and other incentives.
The Defense Committee of the British Parliament said: It is clear that Huawei is closely linked to the Chinese state and the Communist Party of China, despite its statements to the contrary.
Lawmakers warned against succumbing to the anti-China idea and urged the UK to recognize the mutual benefits of Chinese participation in the economy.
The lawmakers said: The UK should ensure that decisions on participation by Chinese companies are made in an evidence-based manner, and decisions on removal should be made only when the risks are clear.
[ad_2]
