[ad_1]
The post-Haifa motto ended after the ruin of Beirut. And if the port of Haifa was likely to become the port of the eastern Mediterranean and the interior of the Arab region, reaching the ports of Dubai and Manama, then the port of Beirut is more like the port of Hodeidah in Yemen: ships with food aid just to stave off hunger. And nothing prevents it from becoming a port of Mogadishu for pirates in the foreseeable future.
The important thing is that we do not submit to the dictates of Emmanuel Macron or the terms of the IMF … and in particular, not to allow an increase in the “value added” tax (TVA), according to Hassan Nasrallah’s concern for the well-being and dignity of the Lebanese.
The French initiative ended with an eloquent lesson in democracy and also in the origins of courtesy. Macron’s disregard for the parliamentary majority is totally incompatible with the prestigious political experience in Lebanon, whether in the 2005 elections, or in the results of the polls in 2009 (ask the representatives who hid in the hotels, when assassin squads roamed the streets looking for them), leading to a period of postponement. That is, elections and prolongation of the life of parliament, until all obey the law that Hezbollah wants, by conviction free of any threat, intimidation or intimidation, and then especially in the high-level democratic experiment for a period of two years until that the representatives of the nation reach the conviction (and freely) in the election. Michel Aoun as President of the Republic.
After Nasrallah’s slow and strict speech at the same time, and if we are convinced by the narration and the argumentation, it seems that Macron himself is the one who aborted and betrayed the French initiative. This is how I wanted to inspire Hassan Nasrallah and the many voices of “Manar”. In fact, it appears that Macron is nothing more than a new victim of Fouad Siniora, the favorite figure among the opposition crowd, a symbol of conspiracy against the “resistance” and eternally responsible for the loss of Lebanon’s finances and economy. .
Indeed, it is surprising that Nasrallah, who resented the inclusion of his party and its leaders in accusing Macron of all corruption, also defended the clean hand of President Michel Aoun and his staff, as well as his main Shiite “partner.” Nabih Berri. This is consistent with the statement of the Amal Movement, which vehemently rejected such accusations against its deputies, ministers, head and other members, including employees, directors, etc. Also the deputy Gebran Bassil and his current. It turns out that they are all proactive in seeking reform, fighting corruption, and transparency. This indicates that corruption is the prerogative of those who were only the previous March 14.
To prevent the French initiative from straying from the right path, President Macron should only listen to Nasrallah’s advice, or at least the Al-Manar newsletter presentations that were issued with logic and facts. It is also advisable to boycott the former heads of government, who deceived the entire French administration and misrepresented the facts, despite the fact that Nasrallah showed great tolerance for his call for the cooperation of everyone, including these “traitors”.
Speaking in practice, Macron deserves a severe reprimand, as long as he ignores the constant policies that govern Lebanon, the first of which is that the task of any government is to protect the back of the “resistance.” In a clearer sense, Lebanon is “democratically” condemned to remain vigilant in protecting Hezbollah’s weapons. Its political system, economy, international and Arab relations, its future and even its identity are dedicated to the service of arms.
And by this we understand that the back of the resistance is subject to betrayal, not from foreign enemies, but from “within.” A large part of the Lebanese are inclined to stab the resistance in the back. Treacherous people, many clients. Based on this fact, which Macron did not understand, his initiative is “Petra” and “no charter”, and is not consistent with Lebanon’s interest.
In conclusion, as long as France does not support the survival of the resistance weapons and does not align with Hezbollah (and Bashar al-Assad) in the Syrian war, it does not recognize the right of the Shiite duo in the Ministry of Finance and others, and it does not distinguish between corrupt and clean and transparent, and it does not respect the parliamentary majority … there is no good On its initiative, if it is not modified according to the instructions of Mufti Ahmed Qabalan.
It is the same lesson that the Lebanese should understand.
[ad_2]
