[ad_1]
In a televised speech, Nasrallah said: “We must pause carefully at what happened in recent weeks in the city of Kaftoun, and the fall of the army martyrs in the fighting in the north, and here we, as Lebanese, must appreciate the efforts and sacrifices and go to the army leadership and army families with condolences, and we appreciate the popular position in the north. ” People gathered around the army and security forces. He mentioned that the groups they encountered in the north were not preparing for small operations, but for major military action, and the evidence of that is what the army found with them. He added: “We have previously warned about attempts to revive ISIS again in Iraq and Syria, and it is natural that they begin. Preparing in Lebanon to justify the permanence of US forces in the region, and stated that “Washington is trying to justify its permanence in the region under the title of the international coalition to fight ISIS, which wants to revive in the region.”
Sayyed Nasrallah noted that on the southern border with occupied Palestine, “the Israeli army is still on alert and this is a good thing,” noting that “this is the longest period of time for the Israeli army to mobilize since the year 1948 and its soldiers do not dare to move, and we are waiting and seeing what will happen in the days. ” And the next few weeks. “
In response to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly, Nasrallah noted that “Netanyahu is trying to incite the Lebanese people against Hezbollah and is talking about a place between Beirut and the suburbs and stating that we are storing missiles in it, “and revealed that” the media will be invited at that time. At ten tonight, to enter the place Netanyahu spoke of, to expose himself to the media, adding: “We do not put missiles in the Beirut port or near a gas station, and we know very well where to put our missiles. “
He explained that after the explosion of the port, the resignation of the Hassan Diab government and the launch of the French initiative, “we all supported him, and the first of his items was to assign a prime minister, and the club of the four exes was formed. prime ministers, and we have no problem and they gave us 3 names with Mustafa Adib. We would like to facilitate the process and after asking for Mustafa Adib, we agreed. On him without preconditions, and after the transfer, he asked Adeeb to wait and There were those who were going to negotiate, and there were no discussions or opinions, which forced the President of the Republic to invite the blocs to dialogue. He pointed out that the action indicated as if what was required was for the government to be completed and led to President Michel Aoun. According to the logic of this government, whether he signs it or not, and as if the objective was that the most important authority for the president of the republic after the Taif agreement, which is to participate in the formation n, you’re done. It is considered that the French were covering a process to cancel the most important powers of the Lebanese president after Taif, which is to participate in the formation of the government.
Nasrallah stated that “the negotiations were conducted with us because, of course, the two sides could not bypass Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, and the one who negotiated with us was not the President-designate but the former Prime Minister, Saad Hariri. “. He pointed out that “the heads of the government clubs wanted to distribute the portfolios and appoint only the ministers, and we would have taken note only of appointing ministers and the method of distribution between the sects, and we rejected the method of having all the ministers appointed without take the opinion of the parliamentary blocs and we reject what was presented to us because it is a danger to the country. ” And he indicated that the parliamentary blocs showed to President Aoun that they did not agree with 14 ministers, and it is dangerous for a party to appoint all the country’s ministers ”.
Nasrallah pointed out that “since Taif, the prime minister does not interfere with the names, but distributes and the blocks are named, and we have made progress in strengthening his powers, not weakening them by inserting it into the nomenclatures and his right to veto some of them, but that he appoints all the ministers is an illogical matter, and I do not want to enter into a constitutional debate. ” “But these rules did not exist. Why do they want to abolish the parliamentary blocs today? And he mentioned that “we said that the prime minister can discuss the names of the ministers and reject and this increases the powers of the prime minister and from 2005 until today the established custom is the agreement between the prime minister.” The government and parliamentary blocs are in the portfolios and the appointment of ministers will be in the blocs.
He continued: “I want to impose new norms that violate the constitution in favor of parties that do not represent a majority in parliament, and when we asked if the French initiative included what the club of former presidents had proposed, they told us no.” He noted that “through communication between us and the president-designate, he was clear and confirmed that he has no goal for a confrontational government, and he apologized.” “After the apology, the attack focused on the Shiite duo and President Aoun,” he added.
Nasrallah revealed that “the offer during the last month was not a government of salvation. Rather, it was the delivery of the country of all without discussion to the club of the four former heads of government, except for sanctions and French pressure, and the most important in this offer was the acceptance of the Shiite duo or not, and they did not speak to anyone but us because they considered whether we agreed. No one will oppose what is proposed, and the proposed government must appoint the club of former prime ministers , any Lebanese team, part of the parliamentary minority and part of the Sunni community because there are other Sunni representatives.
In response to “some friends”, Nasrallah said: “Hezbollah must participate in the government to protect the back of the resistance so that the government of May 5, 2008 is not repeated, and Hezbollah wants to participate in the government, fearing so What remains of Lebanon, because there are those who want to hand Lebanon over to the IMF. He added: “We are not afraid of Hezbollah, but of the Lebanese people. We fear for our country and our people, and we fear for the depositors’ money, and we fear for the conditions of the International Monetary Fund. “And he asked,” Shouldn’t we be afraid of a government that can sell state property under financial pressure? ” And resort to privatization and taxes to cover the deficit? “
Nasrallah addressed French President Emmanuel Macron, saying: “I am looking for the party that wanted to control the country and eliminate the political forces with a cover of yours.” He asked: “To what extent did President Aoun fail to hold Macron accountable? What did the man do?” He noted that “the head of the Resistance Loyalty Bloc, Muhammad Raad, told Macron that we agree with 90% of the French newspaper, and here we ask what we agreed to and did not respect. We are known how we keep our promises and the we comply and sacrifice to fulfill them “.
Nasrallah continued, addressing Macron: “We choose democracy, and what it demands of us is incompatible with democracy. If democracy is not the result of the elections that produced the majority, then what is democracy, give the neck to the minority”. Nasrallah asked: “Is democracy for the majority to hand over the country to a part of the parliamentary minority?” He added: “We went to Syria to fight against groups that France says are terrorists, and in Syria we are defending our homeland and preventing terrorism from reaching it and we do not take money from the state, our money is known from the source.” He added: “We reject the harassment during the last month and exceed the facts. The situation must not continue as it is, otherwise there will be no results. I call for a review of the method, analysis and performance, so as not to damage national dignity.”
Nasrallah added: “We welcomed Macron and his initiative as a friend who loves Lebanon. We did not welcome him as a guardian, guardian, judge or ruler of Lebanon, and we still welcome the French initiative, but the previous method that he had place last month can not be completed. ” “We are open for the benefit of our country,” he added.
