[ad_1]
Faten Hajj wrote in “Al-Akhbar”: Some of the Master 1 students in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the Lebanese University provoked the contest “Textual Approaches to Modern Arabic Thought”, a text of the poet Adonis who “opens a door to normalization with the Israeli enemy.” Calling for the peace of art and literature produced by Jewish writers and artists outside and within Israel.
The writer defends his thesis with arguments drawn from Islam itself, “Islam initially fought with the Jews without boycotting Jewish thought or Jewish culture, and the Romans and Persians fought without boycotting Byzantine, Greek or Persian culture.” Furthermore, “creativity cannot be identified or united with the institution, and it is, in one nation, an ally of creativity in other nations, beyond political conflicts, hostilities and wars.”
The controversy over the text came to light after the results were finally released, which showed a high repetition rate (12 out of 31, at 39%), and not on the day of the exam 10 days ago, and the reason, According to student sources, it is that there was no consensus among the students on Boycotting the competition, making boycott advocates the only ones affected. Therefore, the opinion focused on addressing the competition and expressing a critical position through it, as long as the nature of the material tolerated it, and criticism was prioritized over the extraction of literary phenomena.
Sources asked about the reason for choosing this text at this time and the delicate circumstances that Lebanon is going through, as the level of conversation about neutrality and normalization rises to which the Arab regimes rush, noting that the range of options before the subject is great. Hussein, Zaki Mahmoud, Amin Maalouf and others “.
The students who objected signed a petition demanding that a second teacher re-grade the contest, and that this teacher also correct the second round.
But the subject for the subject’s professor, Joseph Lebs, “was not worth all the hype that came only from those who failed”, considering that “the examiners are mature and mature master’s students who are fully aware that the material is close to texts in modern Arabic thought, that is, should deal with issues The time and current problems, literature and thought are not separated from these problems. What was required of the students was to understand the text and present their critical opinion, and they were free to say what they wanted, provided that this was accompanied by persuasion and arguments and evidence in a solid Arabic language.
He indicated ambiguously that “delicate circumstances should not make us stop thinking”, asking if what is required is that “betray, incriminate and insult, while the text is at the center of the prescribed program of the article”.
Read the full article Press here.
Source: News
