Apology from Adib … between the March 14 attack plan and the required response from the National Alliance!



[ad_1]

The head in charge of government formation, Dr. Mustafa Adeeb, announced his apology for not continuing to work on the formation of a new government. And on the grounds of his apology, he stated that “with the effort reaching its final stages, it became clear to me that the consensus is no longer in place”, indicating that “I previously announced to the blocks that I am not in the process of entering any Political issue I have already informed the blocs that I am not going to name names that constitute a provocation ”.

And as soon as Adeeb finished reading his statement of apology, we witnessed a pre-arranged and coordinated attack against the majority team, especially the Hezbollah coalition, which was launched by the leaders of the March 14 team and the Injez groups, accompanied by pressure on citizens’ livelihoods, and the coordinated attack took several levels …

First, accuse the majority coalition, especially Hezbollah and Amal, of being responsible for obstructing the formation of the government, thwarting the French initiative, and wasting what was described as the last chance to rescue and lift Lebanon and the Lebanese from the suffocating crisis.

Second, manipulate the exchange rate by promoting speculative tools in the financial market to raise the dollar exchange rate and say that this increase, which will negatively affect the purchasing power of citizens and inflame prices, is the result of the growing Hezbollah’s hope of refusing to facilitate President Adeeb’s task of forming an independent government. And prompted him to apologize.

Third, the Al-Anjiz groups are rushing to take to the streets and raise slogans that bear the responsibility of the high price of the dollar and the deterioration of the living conditions of the majority team, with the aim of inciting citizens to return to the squares and rekindle the demand for the formation of an independent government to undertake the implementation of the US coup.

However, any auditor of the aforementioned apology for the coordinated campaign against the majority team warns of the extent of the falsehood and the lack of credibility in presenting the accusations, and that they aim to obscure the facts of what really happened, and who is behind it. from the obstruction of the formation of the government … and thus evade responsibility for the crises it suffers. The Lebanese …

1 – The Prime Minister-designate Adib, contrary to what he suggested in the statement of his apology, did not make any real effort to form a consensual government, but did not consult with the parliamentary blocs and remained all the time consulting and listening only to the directives of the club of former prime ministers, and their insistence on imposing a government formation. Independent »He is the only one who appoints his ministers, and when he finally met, after embarrassing representatives of the Amal coalition and Hezbollah, he maintained his position without moving an inch, refusing to accept that the coalition appointed his ministers of between specialists and non-partisans, and Adeeb remained firm in his position, which is a matter that was not part of any agreement, as he stated in his statement of apology, since the Amal and Hezbollah blocs did not renounce to name their ministers from among the nonpartisan specialists, while President Adib himself is not independent of heaven, and the first to appoint him was the club of former prime ministers. And he agreed with them only on the composition of his government, which did not announce and did not deliver a draft of it to the head of the Jamahiriya, General Michel Aoun, because Adeeb did not obtain the approval of the Amal Hezbollah coalition, and in continuity to his awareness that the President of the Republic would also have a contrary opinion as a partner in the composition process, which appeared in criticizing Adeeb and asking him to communicate and consult with the blocks, and when Adib did not respond to that, President Aoun assumed the task of defending the opinion of the blocs on the nature and form of government …

2 – The March 14 team focused its campaign on supporting Adeeb in the formation of an independent government that no one else would name, and of course behind him the Presidents Club, who were in charge of supervising the government formation process of Adeeb in accordance with Washington and Riyadh … to be an independent government and American wishes.

3- Adib’s apology comes as part of a coordinated plan with the Presidents Club to launch an organized campaign to create a general local environment to increase the level of pressure on Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and the President of the Republic, reinforced by more US sanctions and exacerbate the life crisis of citizens in an attempt to restore the street movement … to pressure the National Alliance Push it to accept the formation of a government of “independent” specialists that does not participate in appointing their ministers … because that is the American condition that was set from the beginning … Either you agree with a government of this type that meets the American conditions, or you have to face more blockade, sanctions and hunger …

Based on this, the US-Saudi team does not want to facilitate the formation of a consensus government that leads to revive the coexistence that previously existed with the national team. Rather, it wants to implement a political coup against the existing equation by attempting to impose a government completely loyal to the US-Saudi team under the name of a government of “independent” specialists. … and this is the issue on which Washington has spent enormous sums of money, specifically on achievement organizations and the media, as admitted by the United States Under Secretary of State, David Hale, in his testimony before Congress ago a few days, which the successive US administrations spent in Lebanon from 2005 until now ten billion dollars Armed forces and civil society organizations …

Faced with this conclusion, which was reconfirmed through Adib’s apology and the systematic campaign initiated by the US-Saudi team, immediately after the apology …

What is the required response from the National Alliance?

In this context, it can be said …

1 – The first essential and obligatory step is the conviction of all the parts of the National Alliance that the American team wants to exclude them from power, weaken them and divide their ranks, to win some of them, if possible, to remove them from the Hezbollah resistance … and thus isolate the resistance and work to disarm it as it is. To achieve the security of the enemy Zionist entity, impose full American hegemony over Lebanon, make it an American Zionist protectorate and make it a base to conspire against the resistance of the Syrian national state …

2- This conviction requires agreeing to develop a unified vision to confront the coup plan that the US-Saudi team is working to implement, a vision that prioritizes how to face the current challenges that are agreed upon, and neutralize all other controversial issues that are not neither priority nor priority. Current.

3- The unified vision of the confrontation requires that the National Alliance resolve its order that there is no way out of the crisis and frustrate the US coup plan without forming a coherent and coherent government according to a vision of economic and financial rescue based on a radical revision of rentier policies that provoke the crisis, and abandoning the policy of keeping Lebanon in a unilateral economic relationship with Western countries, which are using this relationship to blackmail Lebanon and impose their conditions on Lebanon … and so the decision to diversify Lebanon’s economic options taking the decision to accept offers of Chinese, Iranian, Iraqi and Russian projects to help Lebanon without conditions, thus dedicating a new balance in Lebanon’s economic relations with abroad, based on Lebanon occupies a differentiated geographical position as a link and link between East and West, which can only be done if it is This translates into an economic opening to the East, just as it is open to the West … and if economic actors are cautious or fear that their interests will be harmed by making such an option. Then he must realize that he will be the first to benefit from this and that the West will quickly end its blockade and provide assistance to Lebanon to maintain its influence in it. Given the importance of Lebanon in the region and the Arab-Zionist conflict …

Such a response is the way to put an end to the worsening economic and financial crisis, and to work to reactivate the economy by practically initiating projects for the establishment of power plants, waste, railways, dams and other projects that China has offered to do, according to the BOT system, while Lebanon can also stop the bleeding that occurred in its reserves, of dollars in the Central Bank of Lebanon, by accepting Iraqi and Iranian offers to obtain their needs for oil and its derivatives in exchange for payment in pounds and bartering for agricultural and industrial products … and this will lead to the reactivation of productive sectors and their expansion and the provision of job opportunities for the unemployed, and thus reduce unemployment, In addition to stimulating the movement of construction and work of various free professions, which is reflected in the activation of the general economic movement …

Will the National Alliance, which has the parliamentary majority, take its decisions in this direction, which the Secretary of Hezbollah, His Eminence, Hassan Nasrallah, requested, and affirmed that he was present to use all his efforts to make it successful, employing his relations with China, Iran, Iraq and Russia …

If this option is not taken, the interim government is more likely to continue until the arrangement matures, which is not planned before the end of the US presidential elections and the announcement of its results, which may take a time unknown, especially if President Donald Trump does not guarantee victory and his refusal to hand over power. For the winning president, under the title, questioning the integrity of the elections … which was prepared for him in advance by questioning the vote-by-mail …



[ad_2]