[ad_1]
After chapters of suspense and anticipation, United States President Donald Trump finally elected Conservative Justice Amy Connie Barrett to the Supreme Court, succeeding the late Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died a few days ago at the age 87 after a fight with cancer.
In a report, the French magazine “Le nouvel Observateur” reviewed the 10 most important characteristics of Trump’s new candidate, highlighting that her election would arouse the ire of Democrats and set the stage for a heated fight in the Senate to ratify her appointment. weeks ago. Shortly after the presidential elections in November.
1 / conservative Catholic
Some describe Amy Connie Barrett as “Joan of Arc” or “Virgin of Aurelian”, the religious right in America, in honor of the French national heroine and saint of the Roman Catholic Church, Joan of Arc.
The magazine believes that this analogy is largely correct, as it was quoted by Barrett, during one of his lectures in 2006 at a Catholic University in Indiana, where he taught for about 15 years, directing his words to students and revealing his convictions. : “If you can keep in mind that your main goal is. Life is not about becoming lawyers, but about knowing, loving, and serving the Lord, and you will become lawyers of a completely different kind.”
Trump nominates Barrett to succeed late Liberal judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Reuters)2 / The People and Praise group
The New York Times previously revealed that Barrett is a member of a religious group called the People and Praise. This group believes, among other things, that “husbands have authority over their wives and that they are responsible for leading the family.” It also emphasizes the importance of family life and traditional gender roles and prayers.
In 1996, the group’s founder’s nephew stated that his goal is to evoke faith in all aspects of life, saying, “We believe there is no life outside of the Christian life … so everything we do we do for Christ and for others “.
3 / Abortion
The magazine believes that one of the central points after Barrett’s appointment is approved will be his position on the abortion issue. He criticized the famous 1973 ruling, known as Roe vs. Wade, a landmark ruling by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that the United States Constitution protects the freedom of a pregnant woman to choose an abortion without government restrictions.
In 2017, he claimed that he would “not impose his personal beliefs at the expense of the law,” but with a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, nothing would prevent the abortion law from being damaged and Barrett could join any campaign against him at heart. of the court.
4 / Bright
Amy Connie Barrett was born 48 years ago in Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans, and is the oldest of seven children born to a lawyer father and a stay-at-home mother. He completed his education at a local school with distinction, before continuing to study law with equal brilliance and becoming an assistant to the justices of the Supreme Court, including Antonin Scalia, between 1998 and 1999. Like Scalia, Barrett takes an approach ” textual “by adhering to the text of the constitution, which justifies its more conservative interpretations.
5 / a large family
Barrett has been married for nearly 20 years to Jess Barrett, a South Bend, Indiana attorney. They have 7 children, all under the age of 20, including two from Haiti, who were adopted, one after the 2011 earthquake and the other, a younger boy with Down syndrome.
6 / Possession of weapons
In 2019, he disagreed with a court ruling he was working with to prevent a man convicted of fraud from having a gun. She wrote at the time, saying: “History does not contradict common sense … Legislative bodies have the right to prevent dangerous people from possessing weapons, but this power only applies to people who pose a danger. Doing so on behalf of of fraud is to lower Chapter Two of the Constitution to the rank of second-class law. ” Although this chapter confers a unique right closely related to the natural right to legitimate defense “.
7 / Health care law
One of the first files Barrett will address will be the health bill, known by its acronym “Obama Care” after President Barack Obama signed it in March 2010. On November 10, the Supreme Court is scheduled to return. to review the fate of this law, which inaugurated a reform of the former president’s health insurance system and was one of his most important successes.
Chief Justice John Roberts was able in 2012 to salvage this law at the last minute, which did not suit Justice Amy Barrett, who commented on the matter, saying, “Roberts had more of the health care law than what I could just to save him. “
Trump has been in contact with Barrett since 2018 for a Supreme Court seat (Reuters)8 / Trump
In 2018, Trump contacted Amy Barrett for a Supreme Court seat following the sudden resignation of Justice Anthony Kennedy, but Barrett’s meeting with Trump did not go as expected as the Conservative Justice was not “in his best moment, “according to a source.
In fact – confirms the French magazine – it is not President Trump who carefully chooses the judges of the Supreme Court, but this task is carried out by the influential Federalist Society, which was founded in 1982, and of which Barrett was a part. and all high-ranking conservative judges.
9 / Illegal date
Senators typically meet face-to-face with a president-appointed judge or a judge prior to the confirmation session, but House Democrats are furiously outraged by Trump’s decision and Republicans weeks before the elections.
Therefore, some of them announced that they would not meet with their candidate for Supreme Court membership, while Oregon Senator Geoff Merkley described his candidacy as an “illegal appointment”, saying: “I personally do not wish to state that the appointment is acceptable. “
As for his colleague Bob Casey from Pennsylvania, “Why do you want me to meet someone who already knows what will decide on each file?”
10 / retroactive laws
Lopes says it is now possible to understand the Democrats’ anger that the Supreme Court is clearly leaning to the right (6 just to 3), and there will be no incentive to seek a minimum level of consensus. Worse still, the way will now be open for the more conservative Republican states to pass “reactionary” laws, confident that every chance of success – from the Supreme Court – is on their side.
The magazine concludes that it is like a true horror movie, but if the Democratic candidate Joe Biden wins the presidential election and his fellow Democrats control the Senate, this could start a process of reform of the Supreme Court to correct this “anomalous and very dangerous “that threatens American democracy.
[ad_2]
