[ad_1]
But the normalization of the Gulf, and we must admit it, is loaded with a symbolic value that comes precisely from the Arab “symbolism of the head”, correct and incorrect. The Arab has always been portrayed in thousands of European and American literature, photographs and cartoons, a man with a head, rich and other things. An Arab in the western subconscious is a man with a diadem (and by the way, the signing ceremony of the Bahrain and Emirati normalization treaties in Washington, this dimension was deliberately absent from the Gulf, and we can guess why). This normalization degrades this symbolism to its lowest levels now, because it portrays the Arab this time ignorant even of his true enemies, targeting a random blow to Iran, and to Syria and Iraq, sadly blinded … which he has shown that he is capable to justify themselves and accuse us all of wearing Ayatollah turbans and what I like.
However, once again I speak as an Iraqi citizen, this normalization is not only directed at Iran, but also at Israel in countries like Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Hence my final condemnation of him:
I give you this sign: Iraq, for example, is 1006 km from Bahrain. It is an insignificant distance for a large military and intelligence force like Israel, which will be hosted by Bahrain. This would give Israel a new ideal place to sabotage Iraq at all levels: air, sea and intelligence. Iraq is never immune to the evil of Israel, although there is a great distance between them and the lands of another country or countries to the east. On top of that, the rulers of our sister Bahrain, the rulers, have demonstrated an extremist sectarian stance against Iran and against all Shiite majority countries, such as Iraq.
How many places will be available for Israel to sabotage Iraq: The United States is in Iraq itself and with Israeli coordinates, Iraqi Kurdistan is in the north and now Bahrain is in the south. That’s a lot.
Then there is the idea that is intended to spread to the Arab public, which is that every sovereign country has the right to do absolutely whatever it wants. If every Arab looks at the issue of normalization with Israel from the point of view of the neighborhood and its neighborhood, it will seem that the big world and its relations have been reduced to a neighborhood and a neighborhood, while it is not the case, and will discover, too late, how narrow and crisis is your vision. If we don’t say anything else. This is the normalization of needle piercings.
The normalization of the Gulf is loaded with a symbolic value that comes precisely from the Arabic “the symbol of the head.”
Is normalization with the rulers of Israel a betrayal? Here is this historical story repeated by the Gulf media the day his relationship with Qatar worsened:
King Saleh Ismail the Ayubid ruled Damascus and Palestine, and he tried to annex Egypt to his kingdom, and Egypt was ruled by his nephew, King Saleh Ayoub, his wife Shajarat al-Durr. So he prepared a great army, so King Saleh Ismail asked some of the kings of the crusader kingdoms to help him in his nephew’s war, so they stipulated that he give Jerusalem to them in exchange for help, so he accepted and gave them the city of Ashkelon on top of that, and a fierce battle took place between the two armies, and the place of the battle was in Gaza. At the end of the battle, King Saleh Ayoub defeated King Ismail’s army and the Crusader armies. As for the Crusader armies, they fled to their cities, leaving behind thirty thousand people. As for King Saleh, he continued his advance towards the city of Jerusalem and liberated it, and Jerusalem remained Arab until it was again occupied by Israel. ” The press concludes by saying: “This betrayal took place after Saladin’s death, a few months after his death. This is the dark side of the history of our Arab nation.”
The story was published about the most famous betrayals in Arab-Islamic history, except what appeared? These elements of the story coincide with the normalization of the Emirates and Bahrain, whose normalization is a good one: that you exposed masks to the Arab public, some of which were abandoned, and I hope they hate something that is good for you.
Prophet Muhammad bin Abdullah said: “Are not faces lost?” And I think the verb has been observed here, a bit moving away from distorting the transcription connotation.
* An Iraqi writer and painter
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here