[ad_1]
The journalist Nicola Nassif wrote an article in the newspaper “Al Akhbar” under the title “The two”: The bag of money or the apology of Adeeb “in which he said:” Because the martyrdom of a dead person is contesting the testimony, nobody dispels an ambiguity around the money bag and what happened from it, or not, in a deal. Taif. The former parliamentarians on the stage deny having assigned him to the Shiite community, and others, his colleagues, are sure. They were all at the same table. Who do you believe? “
The writer continued in his article: “The Shiite duo no longer addresses the dispute over the money bag as a partial and transitory problem in the formation of the government, similar to what happened in previous governments for some time, and then the debate receded Taking hold of it, for him, became more than just sharing shares and distributing bags. In the blocs and large parties, and closer to a political project in which local parties and states participate, so facing the project, even if it is in a portfolio as a model, it is considered a defense of an entity and political existence.
Nassif added: “The project aims to completely remove Hezbollah from executive power, strip him as a Shiite duo with President Nabih Berri, who is concerned about him from this portfolio, and cause him to lose his role in appointing his ministers by let other local forces clashed by President-designate Mustafa Adeeb appoint Shiite ministers in the other portfolios.
What is being asked takes him back for the first time to before 2005, when he first entered the procedural authority in the government of President Naguib Mikati with a non-partisan minister, Tarad Hamadeh, then brought the party to the resignation of Hamadeh – an active second minister of the party in the next government headed by President Fouad. Siniora the same year is Mohamed Fneish. Since then it has become the center of the formation of successive governments. He shares the Shiite part between him and Berri, who holds the majority, and has maintained since 2008 the quorum described in successive governments. In the government of President Hassan Diab in 2020, my party was not used by all other parties to him, but he was granted, as president of the Council, the right to appoint the minister in the bag that was assigned to him. What the Shiite duo are called upon today is to deny them the nomination of their ministers in the Adib government, in a further step along the way to remove him completely from government. From there, he spoke of a political project that goes beyond the money bag.
According to the author, “What has become a foregone conclusion when the Shiite duo has the following data:
1 – It continues to support the French initiative, and does not seek to quarrel with the French. He is surprised that Paris is dealing with him realistically, albeit without fully understanding his point of view, much more so than Lebanese parties like President Saad Hariri. His continued support for the French initiative and not against it, made him absorb the first wave of what he considered an assault against him, which was the insistence on losing his money portfolio and preventing him from electing his ministers. The first wave led to three consecutive declines in a week, which is this week: Paris pulled out of the 15-day deadline that ended on Tuesday, then extended to Thursday, and then extended through tomorrow Sunday and may also extend further. The President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, withdrew from signing Adeeb’s draft last Wednesday after he was rumored to support him in everything he did. Adeeb twice retracted presenting his cabinet draft and also twice retracted his apology for not forming a government.
2 – The Shiite duo had no explanation for Hariri’s coup against them, surprisingly, and it seemed that they were taking more French initiative than they required, and wanted to implicate the two in a problem with President Emmanuel Macron. In his meeting with Hariri last Saturday, Berri asked him: If you were prime minister, wouldn’t you appoint your ministers while we would appoint our ministers?
He also asked him: How do you accept that I appoint your ministers and not allow others to appoint your ministers?
The head of the council gave him two lists in a row, each of the five possible names for the minister on the money bag, so he rejected them and insisted that the name not be issued by the Shiite duo. The most important thing is that the Ministry of Finance does not have the origin of the problem.
It is not unknown to both that the real negotiator is Hariri, and not Adeeb, who vaguely revealed from his consultations with the blocs, that he does not have clear ideas except that he wants to form a government of specialists in understanding with the French. Later, the idea of rotating between the bags appeared to the public, which meant nothing more to the couple than to point them, to get the bag of money …
The writer continued in his article: “The Shiite duo no longer addresses the dispute over the money bag as a partial and transitory problem in the formation of the government, similar to what happened in previous governments for some time, and then the debate receded Taking hold of it, for him, became more than just sharing shares and distributing bags. In the blocs and large parties, and closer to a political project in which local parties and states participate, so facing the project, even if it is in a portfolio as a model, it is considered a defense of an entity and political existence.
Nassif added: “The project aims to completely remove Hezbollah from executive power, strip him as a Shiite duo with President Nabih Berri, who is concerned about him from this portfolio, and cause him to lose his role in appointing his ministers by let other local forces clashed by President-designate Mustafa Adeeb appoint Shiite ministers in the other portfolios.
What is being asked takes him back for the first time to before 2005, when he first entered the procedural authority in the government of President Naguib Mikati with a non-partisan minister, Tarad Hamadeh, then brought the party to the resignation of Hamadeh – an active second minister of the party in the next government headed by President Fouad. Siniora the same year is Mohamed Fneish. Since then it has become the center of the formation of successive governments. He shares the Shiite part between him and Berri, who holds the majority, and has maintained since 2008 the quorum described in successive governments. In the government of President Hassan Diab in 2020, my party was not used by all other parties to him, but he was granted, as president of the Council, the right to appoint the minister in the bag that was assigned to him. What the Shiite duo are called upon today is to deny them the nomination of their ministers in the Adib government, in a further step along the way to remove him completely from government. From there, he spoke of a political project that goes beyond the money bag.
According to the author, “What has become a foregone conclusion when the Shiite duo has the following data:
1 – It continues to support the French initiative, and does not seek to quarrel with the French. He is surprised that Paris is dealing with him realistically, albeit without fully understanding his point of view, much more so than Lebanese parties like President Saad Hariri. His continued support for the French initiative and not against it, made him absorb the first wave of what he considered an assault against him, which was the insistence on losing his money portfolio and preventing him from electing his ministers. The first wave led to three consecutive declines in a week, which is this week: Paris pulled out of the 15-day deadline that ended on Tuesday, then extended to Thursday, and then extended through tomorrow Sunday and may also extend further. The President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, withdrew from signing Adeeb’s draft last Wednesday after he was rumored to support him in everything he did. Adeeb twice retracted presenting his cabinet draft and also twice retracted his apology for not forming a government.
2 – The Shiite duo had no explanation for Hariri’s coup against them, surprisingly, and it seemed that they were taking more French initiative than they required, and wanted to implicate the two in a problem with President Emmanuel Macron. In his meeting with Hariri last Saturday, Berri asked him: If you were prime minister, wouldn’t you appoint your ministers while we would appoint our ministers?
He also asked him: How do you accept that I appoint your ministers and not allow others to appoint your ministers?
The head of the council gave him two lists in a row, each of the five possible names for the minister on the money bag, so he rejected them and insisted that the name not be issued by the Shiite duo. The most important thing is that the Ministry of Finance does not have the origin of the problem.
It is not unknown to both that the real negotiator is Hariri, and not Adeeb, who vaguely revealed from his consultations with the blocs, that he does not have clear ideas except that he wants to form a government of specialists in understanding with the French. Later, the idea of rotating between the bags appeared to the public, which meant nothing more to the couple than to point them, to get the bag of money …
[ad_2]
