President Aoun would not have called for consultations without being aware of the crisis.

The Office of Information of the Presidency of the Republic responded to the apology of the “Democratic Encounter”, pointing out that “the statement issued yesterday on the” Democratic Encounter “would not have merited a response if it had not included a set of intentional fallacies aimed at offending a rescue step for the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun. As evidenced by the fact that the “meeting” apologized for not participating in the consultations before knowing their objective, and described them as “contrary to principles and eluding to the Taif. “The truth is that the President of the Republic would not have invited the heads of the parliamentary blocs to the consultations without being aware of the crisis that could result if the dispute continued over a series of points. formation of the government, it becomes impossible in that formation, and the country falls under the prohibited. As for saying “violate the principles”, from which the statement of the ” ntro ”, who should have known the origins before deciding not to participate. So, that the representatives of the “meeting” tell us where the text is that prevents the president of the country from consulting with the parliamentary blocs when the country’s situation so requires.

He added: “The president of the republic has always sought to protect the unity of the country and maintain political stability. Forming a government of salvation is one of the objectives he pursued through his meetings with the heads of the blocs. If the representatives of the “democratic meeting” were jealous of the supreme interest of the country, they would have participated and defined their position. Instead of always resorting to the use of phrases repeated by the members of the “assembly”, wholesalers or retailers, with the aim of offending the President of the Republic and its collective role that is consolidating day by day, and this may annoy them with others who did not see any positive aspect in the president’s move, so they invented negatives that did not exist in the first place to exclude themselves. the inevitable consultation when the circumstances are like the ones we live in, to make the right decision.In the end, the “democratic meeting” would have apologized for his false accusations instead of an apology for not coming to the Baabda Palace.