“Intentional fallacies” … The Presidency of the Republic responds to the “Democratic Encounter”!

The statement from the Office of Presidential Information indicated that “the statement issued yesterday on the” democratic meeting “did not deserve a response if it had not included a set of intentional fallacies aimed at offending a rescue step carried out by the President of the Republic, evidenced for the fact that the “meeting” apologized for not participating in the consultations before him. He knows his objective, and qualifies it as “contrary to the principles and eluding the Taif.” The correct opinion is that the President of the Republic does not would have invited the heads of the parliamentary blocs to the consultations without being aware of the crisis that could result if the dispute were to continue on a series of points related to the formation of the government. The saying “violation of property”, therefore originates the declaration of “meeting”, which should have had knowledge of the assets before making the decision not to participate.

He added, “As for the discussion on overcoming Taif, the representatives of the” meeting “tell us where the text is that prevents the president of the country from consulting with the parliamentary blocs when the country’s situation so requires.
He continued: “The president of the republic has always sought to protect the unity of the country and maintain political stability. Forming a government of salvation is one of the goals that he intended through his meetings with the heads of the blocs. If the representatives of the “democratic meeting” were jealous of the supreme interest of the country, they would have participated and defined their position instead of always resorting to the use of repeated phrases by the members of the “meeting”, wholesale or retail, with the aim of offending the President of the Republic and their collective role that is strengthened day by day. They are in charge of the consultation, which is inevitable when the circumstances are like the ones we live in, in order to make the right decision. “
“In the end, it would have been better for the ‘democratic gathering’ to apologize for their false accusations rather than apologize for not coming to the Baabda Palace!