[ad_1]
… What will happen today at the Baabda presidential palace? Does President Michel Aoun sign the “de facto” government of independent specialists regardless of their observations on the mechanism of his generation without consulting him, and is it the partner in the signing of the decree that conforms it, not with the pillars of the ruling coalition? Or do you intend to request the modification of some names to “correct the image”, even if only formally? Or do you reject the training in form and content, for the president-designate, Mustafa Adib, to apologize or retire?
These questions overwhelmed Beirut yesterday, which did not rest for hours before the end of the 15-day period in which French President Emmanuel Macron forced the Lebanese political class to form a “mission government” that would put the country on the path of structural and structural reforms that will pave the way for an agreement with the International Monetary Fund that outlines the exit framework. From a deep financial well and provides the country with “doses” that ease the slow path of death, awaiting the “needle” of resurgence, which will only come with political reforms that include Hezbollah’s position and its participation in the scenarios. of the region and arrangements related to the adaptation of the political system to the role of the party as an extension of the party.
These questions collided with the announcement yesterday afternoon that Adeeb will go to Baabda Palace at eleven o’clock this afternoon to present his training to the President of the Republic, after the important events witnessed on the last Sunday of the “French deadline “Which has become, since September 1, the” regulator “of Lebanese reality. Calendar and behavior of the different political parties. These developments are:
* The announcement of the media office of the President of Parliament, Nabih Berri, “The problem is not with the French, the problem is internal and from within. A title was awarded to the government: jurisdiction in exchange for disloyalty to partisanship, lack of affiliation in parliament, fatwas in ministries, harassment abroad, and failure to initiate consultations. Therefore, we inform the Prime Minister-designate of “ours” and ours, our unwillingness to participate on these fundamentals in government, and we inform him of our willingness to cooperate to the fullest extent possible in all matters. necessary for the stability and finances of Lebanon, to undertake reforms and save its economy.
Berri’s statement came a day after a call he received from Macron on Saturday night in an attempt to find a way out of the Treasury knot, which the Shiite duo Berri – «Hezbollah» declared as a “statute” and out. of circulation in the context of the principle of luggage rotation, which Adeeb – and the French initiative – considers the starting point for the reform train. With insistence that this duo name who will take charge of it, even if it does not have a direct political and party affiliation.
The information was crossed when the Macron-Berri call did not conclude with the withdrawal of the latter from his position regarding the money bag, leading to what LBCI TV reported that the French president asked the president of Parliament before his decisive rejection: “Does this mean that we can now form a government without the Shiite duo, Berry pointed out, if you formed without us, they would form.
* The leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, Gebran Bassil, declared to him in a speech: “We are very excited about the success of the French initiative, and at the same time we have great fear that it will not succeed”, emphasizing: “We are not concerned the distribution of names or bags, and we are not going to enter and we will only be facilitators. ” At the birth of the government “, in parallel to a group of questions, among which it stands out:” Why did you refuse to adopt the rotation in this particular circumstance? We are with the rotation, but we are not with the bullying abroad to impose anything on each other “, and adds:” Why insist on forming a government by a party without consulting anyone under the title of competition, disloyalty and bullying abroad? Did we lose 12 days without consultation to pressure President Aoun to expire the two-week period, fearing the failure of the French initiative and the collapse of the economic situation? We hope that the scenario presented today is not that the government is formed as we want, or we apologize and the initiative fails and the country collapses.
The bundle of questions posed by Bassil and later Berri’s stance quickly caused a stir in Beirut, while some consider that the words of the head of the “Free Movement” reflected the deficits of the Aoun team throughout the course of authorship, and later it would have translations when the President of the Republic received the training of Adeeb.
In the same context, some others saw that the “withdrawal” of the Speaker from the training file amounts to the Shiite duo withdrawing their hand, which means a “veto” to a government that will only be minimized (probably 14 ministers) and the parties are absent, directly or indirectly, and he loses this. The duo had the bag of money in which they were targeted by the US sanctions, which included former Minister Ali Hassan Khalil. His ministerial statement will not include controversial political headlines, and was not composed in accordance with the balance of the parliamentary elections and the majority they produced. The party constitutes its support for “free movement”, and its creation also broke all the rules. What marked the formation of governments since 2005, in which each group used to form their portfolios and names of “government”, between the denial of the role of the designated president.
However, informed circles read on the lines the positions of Berri and Bassil to give an urgent “green light” to facilitate the birth of the government, most likely today unless there are surprises, considering that the President of Parliament, when announcing his refusal to participate in government according to the principles adopted by Adeeb, but wanted to “save face.” Whereas the president-designate was weaving his formation in the first place according to the standard of integral rotation and does not hand over to the parties that named him in the allocation consultations to choose the names within the sectarian distribution away from any partisan loyalty.
In the opinion of these circles, when the decree was issued to form an Adib government with the balance of the French initiative for Washington to give it a great boost by launching the route of sanctions against Hezbollah allies, it will be difficult for the parties of the ruling coalition ambush him in Parliament, withdrawing his trust, considering that it will turn them into Once again, officials are responsible to Paris and the international community for blowing up the “Macron government”, which is expected to include names striking and prominent that make a positive impact, and it is also likely that the outside will take care of it with the forefront of financial support.
While the same circles considered that if things went according to what is supposed today, that is, Aoun signed the formation as is, or asked for amendments that did not destroy the foundation of authorship that Paris supported with an equation, TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT, Adeeb , who fought in the middle of writing and to his right Macron and his heads of government. The former would have managed to reach more than one point in form and content, and put the country in a “rest stop” for the passage of regional storms or the clear directions of the wind in it, which may have formed a point of French intersection. Iranian, though not long after the ruling coalition was forced to grapple with reality. The new is governed by the equation, “Macron is in front of you and Trump is behind you.”
Yesterday, signals made by Hezbollah allies reflected a concern that made some wonder if it would leave practical repercussions in the way of the government’s birth, such as challenging the government pact or a session that gave it confidence in a situation boycotted by the representatives of the Shiite duo.
[ad_2]
