Al Khalifa normalization after Zayed’s sons: on behalf of Bin Salman



[ad_1]

“Today there is an event worth celebrating.” It may not seem surprising what some Israelis said when announcing Bahrain’s addition to the ranks of public normalization with the enemy entity, in contrast to their indifference when Abu Dhabi declared its relations with Tel Aviv. Because Manama, which has been completely dependent on the Saud family since before the last two soldiers invaded the tiny island to suppress the “February 14” uprising, took such a step, it means that Riyadh fully supports it and He commends what he has done and is waiting for the opportunity to reveal himself. This time, it is not a “test balloon” that Saudi Arabia throws through its “canary of coal mines” represented by Al Khalifa. Rather, it is a locomotive that Abu Dhabi started with the blessing of Mohammed bin Salman, and which will definitely reach the latter when the grounds are ready. The Gulf normalization trio, under the auspices of the United States, continues with its plan to consolidate the fait accompli, while the resistance factions work to weave threads of a different reality, based on the fact that the conversation about the settlement has died and is no longer valid for circulation.

The recent “peace agreement” with the enemy Israeli entity was not expected to be confined to the Emirati regime, just as it was not surprising that Abu Dhabi was followed on paper by the oppressive regime in Bahrain, whose name was recorded at the top of the list of conspirators on the question of Palestine and its people, after his people got bored. And unfairly. The common space between these regimes, in its essence, subordination, positioning and alienation of their peoples and problems, takes for granted their succession on this path, reaching the point of identification and coincidence in content, contexts and times.
As is the case with the Al Zayed regime, the announcement of the “peace agreement” with the Al Khalifa regime was preceded by overt and covert steps, which were initiated by the oppressive regime of the Bahrain regime against the enemy entity, which he tended to take the last step. Far from the fact that the Emirati regime paved the way for the Bahrain regime, the latter is one of the Gulf regimes that most needs an external umbrella; Since he is rejected by his people, which makes him a prisoner of foreign interests, and his approach reflects the reality of those who dominate the decision in Manama. In this context, it is expected that, in the coming days, many meetings and exchanged visits with the enemy entity will be revealed, as happened after the announcement of the agreement with the UAE.
Also keeping pace, the deal with the Bahrain regime came in response to the needs of Donald Trump’s duo Benjamin Netanyahu in terms of content, time and context. Although this step is part of a conspiratorial scheme aimed at Palestine and the region, on the other hand, it has the positive effect of exposing more masks of repressive regimes that are trying to cover themselves with artificial sectarian leaderships. This is because classifying the camps according to their position on liberation issues is always in the interests of the people, something that the oppressed people of Bahrain need. After declaring your alliance with the enemy, there will be no excuse for anyone (and before there was no excuse) to take a frank and direct position on this tyrannical regime, except those who also decided, and for special accounts, to declare their position in the field. from Tel Aviv.
Likewise, and as is the case with the Emirates agreement, the Bahrain agreement is more an expression of an existing reality than a foundation for a new reality. This does not contradict the fact that the normalization process aims to elevate alliances to a new stage on the basis that the fate of these regimes depends on the fate of the occupation entity, and in the face of the same threats. Most importantly, the series continues until Netanyahu wins the “Saudi” grand prize, concluding a similar deal with the Al Saud regime. However, it seems difficult to decide who is the most brazen, between the regime of Bahrain and that of the United Arab Emirates, in expressing the policies that stem from the fact that the Palestinian question is a burden that must be removed at all costs. This also allows the camps to be given their addresses that express the reality of their location.

Channel 13 reported that a third agreement with an Arab country would be closed before next November

In addition to the dimensions related to the context and the moment that serve both the president of the United States to face his internal reality, and the enemy prime minister facing unprecedented internal challenges, the regime of repression in Bahrain is characterized by being completely subjected to the Saudi regime, unlike the UAE regime, which has its own margin. From this angle, it can be said that the agreement between Manama and Tel Aviv is fully recommended by Saudi Arabia, which indicates the next date to announce a similar agreement with Riyadh, thus completing the circle. Bahrain announced last week that it would allow flights between Israel and the United Arab Emirates to cross its airspace, after Saudi Arabia made a similar decision.
On the Israeli dimension, Netanyahu reiterated his pride in the “achievement” provided by the Bahraini and Emirati regimes, considering that the two agreements embody the equation of “peace for peace and economy versus economy.” It is not a coincidence that Netanyahu reiterates these positions as slogans, because they relate to two tracks: the first is on the Palestinian issue, and the second is within Israel. Thus, I would like to announce that the credit belongs to the Saudi regime, without mentioning it, and to the Bahraini and Emirati regimes for registering the political “achievement” that aims to break the will of the Palestinian people, with all its currents.
And as the culmination of this “victory” of the Zionist right, in the context of disputes under the roof of the settlement plan and in the Israeli internal arena, Haaretz reported that Netanyahu himself announced the “peace agreement” between Israel and Bahrain. , and that he would sign it on Tuesday at the White House along with the normalization agreement with the UAE. According to Israeli radio, the Crown Prince of Bahrain, Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, will participate in the signing ceremony, where he will officially announce the normalization of relations with the Hebrew entity. Netanyahu did not waste this moment to try to use it in the context of promoting the right-wing Israeli logic on the settlement process, as he announced, after Trump called this station a “historic achievement”, that there is a “new phase of peace, and other countries will join, “and he addressed the Israelis. Saying: “I am excited to tell you tonight that we have reached a new peace agreement with another Arab country, with Bahrain. This is in addition to the historic peace agreement with the UAE. ‘ Addressing them with promises in light of the economic and financial crises they face, he added that these agreements “will bring a lot of investment to the Israeli economy.” And he tried to suggest that what happened required extraordinary efforts on his part, as the newly printed regimes establish secret relations with Israel, which in some respects may be more important than announced.
And in the echoes of the event in the Israeli arena, “Channel 12” believed that “the agreement with Bahrain is of a kind of domino effect … which is what the White House wanted, which means that the issue is not a a matter of a country making peace with Israel, but the beginning of a new Middle East. ” For its part, Channel 13 reported that there is a third agreement that will be closed with an Arab country before next November. The channel’s political analyst, Ari Shabit, paused on the Saudi dimension of the agreement with Bahrain, noting that the latter “is a state under the patronage of Saudi Arabia, and it is not really independent, and this means that Saudi Arabia is completely in the road. He did not sign, but is more likely to sign in 6 months. ” Or one year increased dramatically. There is an event here that is worth celebrating ”.

Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here

[ad_2]