[ad_1]
Former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora indicated that there is a germ that is destroying the Lebanese constitution and body, “which is that any party that considers that it has a farm or colony is willing to preserve it and enjoy its wealth, at the expense of the interest of the public. State”. He asked: “What should happen other than the port explosion disaster, for the Lebanese to learn their lesson and realize that it is no longer allowed to continue with the previous behavior that led us to the current stalemate?”
Siniora noted in a press interview that he understands the reasons that led French President Emmanuel Macron to speak harshly during his visit to Lebanon, “However, that does not prevent me from feeling disturbed and bitter, because a foreign president, even if a friend talks to us about this. ” Grammar, due to our repeated failures and our failure to implement reforms for decades, “noting that” what we hear as a result of our shortcomings and our shortcomings is a humiliation to us. “
Siniora called for the formation of a mini-government of specialists, based on the rotation in the distribution of portfolios, including the financial one, pointing out that there should not be a ministry that monopolizes a sect or prohibits it from a sect, “and all the rest is nonsense outside the constitution and the law. ” And warning that ignoring the rotation would mean the fall of some of the reform clauses.
Siniora noted that he does not agree that the nomination of former Prime Minister Dr. Mustafa Adeeb constitutes a violation of the Taif Agreement and an abbreviation of binding parliamentary consultations, noting that what happened was “we proposed a name, others responded and our proposal was not mandatory. ” He warned that Adeeb’s nomination is a last chance, and that if the pact failed to honor it, he would have missed the opportunity for him and Lebanon.
Siniora revealed that the name Adeeb was not suggested by Macron, Najib and Taha Mikati, but Saad Hariri specifically, explaining that “the French president wanted to put a list of three names, so it was a list that actually included both Najib Mikati like Muhammad Al-Hout and Mustafa Adeeb. “
Regarding the reason why the previous heads of government did not propose the name of Nawaf Salam, he replied: “I was the first to nominate for peace in the past, but there was no consensus around him as a result of any objection to him. , so we had to act with responsibility and prudence, to save the country and find a way out of the tunnel. This is what led us to appoint Dr. Adeeb. “He considered that” accepting to assume a clean, fair and ethical personality, but without political experience, a position the size of prime minister, but it is a great sacrifice that we made in exchange for a return to Taif and the constitution. “
Siniora indicated that Lebanon is going through the most difficult stage in its history, “and after two months subsidies for fuels, flour and medicine can be lifted, with the catastrophic social repercussions that this would entail, and therefore we must act as statesmen in the face of this danger “. And I am willing to go to Siberia if there is hope of finding a recipe for salvation there, even at a rate of 1 percent. As for some, it will be easy to theorize about us because he is not in our responsible position, and he does not approach the situation from our corner. “He stressed the need for the Lebanese to assume their responsibilities in the rescue workshop, asking:” Does the signature of the judicial formations need Trump and Putin, and is the Security Council required to intervene to deal with the electrical file? “
Siniora paused on the implications of the French initiative, noting that the countries are not Caritas, “and Paris has strategic interests in the region, and is trying to find a foothold in Lebanon and Iraq in exchange for Turkey, without denying that it also has them. ” Sympathy for Lebanon, especially after the port explosion. “
Siniora emphasized that Macron’s initiative is closer to an adventure that opens a small window in the wall, “and it is up to us if we expand or close that window, depending on the way we act.” He noted that “Washington is monitoring Macron’s initiative. If it succeeds, it adopts it, and if it fails, it disavows it. As for Saudi Arabia, it is in a waiting position.”
He criticized “the military protest that accompanied the head of the” Hamas “political bureau, Ismail Haniyeh, in the Ain al-Hilweh camp, in an unacceptable restoration of the 1982 atmosphere. He added:” We welcome Haniyeh in Lebanon if the goal is to hold a conference that brings the factions together for the good of Palestine. As for the military parade that took place, it is rejected and implies a challenge for the Lebanese state. “
Turning to the issue of the Beirut port explosion, noting that there are rooms that are not subject to official authority and contain materials from which explosives can be made, and wondering: “The secret of keeping large amounts of ammonia in your place for several years, despite its high financial cost, and why its supposed owner did not get it back, unless someone wanted it to stay where it is. “
Siniora pointed out that financial audits should have been carried out on the accounts of all official institutions for years, “on the basis of obliging them before they break, and according to the mechanisms approved in the state.”
Regarding Mar Mikhael’s understanding between Hezbollah and the Free Patriotic Movement, he indicated that Lebanon “paid the price for this understanding, which was based on the formula to hand over Michel Aoun to the Presidency of the Republic in exchange for granting Christian coverage. for weapons “.
And when Siniora is asked about his comment on the armed confrontation in Tariq al-Jadidah, it will suffice to say: “I do not go into alleys and gorges.”
[ad_2]
