[ad_1]
At the government level, Nasrallah said: “We hope that tomorrow (Monday) the parliamentary blocs can nominate a candidate who has the necessary constitutional acceptance to be assigned the task of forming the new government. We need a government capable of advancing the situation. economic and life, reconstruction and carry out reforms. We support going to the maximum. Whether nominating or forming a head of government, we will contribute to lift the country out of the void. “
Referendum and Representation of the People
Nasrallah proposed the formula for the popular referendum. Of course, its results will be in its favor by virtue of the majority and the advances it registers in the ranks of all environments, sects and regions, indicating that someone can come from outside or from within and assume a set of demands … and it assumes some form of representation and says it represents the people. I call for addressing this issue, which means that we agree that any state, government, parliament or any institution must fulfill the aspirations of the people. The Lebanese people are clear about who they are. They are about five million between residents, diffuse and expatriates. The demands of the Lebanese people, how can they be known? Do we adopt the method of demonstrations as some do? If several thousand people came and filed lawsuits, would they represent the people? And if tens of thousands were dropped in their faces, would they express the majority? If this mechanism (the referendum) is agreed, let us use it to express the demands of the people, which the State and the international community must recognize.
He pointed out that there are international, regional and local calls to respond to the demands of the Lebanese people and the Lebanese street, and a government that expresses its will. These are excellent and correct invitations without discussion. However, it is true (… it is intended to be false). Our wish in Lebanon has always been that the government and the state, with all their institutions, express the wishes of our people and translate them in practical and realistic terms. Here we must be clear because there is a fundamental fallacy. He asked: “Do we adopt, for example, the popular referendum mechanism? Opinion polls? Whatever they want, we are present for discussion. But this issue must be addressed so that we understand each other and block the path of all those who impose demands. and aspirations and say popular demands about them. “
Nasrallah said: “We are not claiming that we express the will of all the people. We are expressing the will of those we represent. Therefore, this issue must be addressed. Who said that the people want a neutral and independent government or a government? Technocratic or political or technological government? There is a way. ” “If we consider that the elections represent the people, and the parliamentary majority is the one that says that the people want a government of this type.”
A new political contract
In addition to calling a popular referendum, Nasrallah seized upon French President Emmanuel Macron’s call for a new political contract and said: “We have heard harsh French criticism of the sectarian system in Lebanon. I would say that we are open to any quiet discussion in the field of reach a political contract, but as long as that is the case. ” This dialogue is with the will and consent of the various Lebanese factions. After a hundred years after the establishment of the state of Greater Lebanon, it is good for the Lebanese to discuss this matter. If we assumed that a religious, political or partisan reference and called the Lebanese to a new political contract, they would have considered it an agent and would have given sectarian and sectarian dimensions to their invitation. Years ago, I did not talk about a new political contract, but about a founding conference to develop Taif, which is an existing and existing political contract, and we remembered the reactions and I withdrew the proposal. “
The duo … and Israel
On the Shiite situation, Nasrallah emphasized the depth of the relationship between Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, the cooperation, coordination and complementarity between them. He is the one who always satisfies Lebanon’s greatest interest, which is to protect Lebanon through the equation of the army, the people and the resistance. Some unfortunate incidents among the youth of a village here or there at successive intervals. Things that are rejected and condemned happen and must be faced with conscience, but without a doubt it is because of the strong relationship between the two leaderships that we can overcome these facts with conscience, responsibility and firmness.
Regarding the deterrence equation with the Israeli, Nasrallah said: “The Israeli must understand that when he kills one of our mujahideen, we will kill one of his soldiers, and if they feel any movement, he begins to bombard the perimeter of their positions in the Farms of Shebaa, Al Manara and the western sector. This expresses the state of confusion, anxiety and panic. If we want to answer from Yes, moral or media consumption, because we have done it from day one. But we do not seek media consumption. We want to fix an equation based on the answer to the murder of one of our mujahideen by killing an Israeli soldier in return. We do not look for mechanisms to beat him. He knows we do not want an image, but rather. He knows that we are looking for a soldier to kill him, and he is hiding all his soldiers like mice. This is a force of resistance and this is not a failure … but a point of strength. He wants anything to happen and “saved us.”
He added: “What the Israeli did a few days and weeks ago was recorded in the account and” reached his account “, this is a clear and decisive decision. The issue is a matter of time and scope, and we are not” in a hurry ” In the end, you will hit the road and we will meet you. Threats cannot prevent us from confirming the achievement in Preserving the Deterrence Equation. “
[ad_2]
