The “Free Patriot” accuses Hariri of fabricating a crisis with Aoun

The “Free Patriotic Movement” attacked the designated prime minister, Saad Hariri, accusing him of “fabricating a crisis with the President of the Republic and the political team that supported him” and “fabricating the third-party obstruction problem,” as it accused him. to adopt an “exclusionary approach”, and to have a “clear desire to appoint The Christian minister himself will have half the members of the government plus one”, in the most violent attack on Hariri, in the midst of a political crisis between the two parties that thwarted the announcement of the formation of the government five months ago.
Several initiatives have emerged in recent weeks, including one from Nabih Berri, Speaker of Parliament, and another from the Chairman of the Progressive Socialist Party, Walid Jumblatt. They adhere to the French initiative and the absence of three obstacles, but it did not lead to any result despite repeated calls to form the government and the contacts made by it. It was used by the Maronite Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi to try to find common ground leading to composition.
The political narratives began debates on both sides of the authorship, in which the “Free Patriotic Movement” came into force yesterday, when he saw that the designated president carried out a spectacle movement on Monday “in search of electoral popularity.” After his political council meeting, he said: “The designated prime minister must return to the charter and constitutional principles that he knows well and that he previously adopted in the formation of each government, because it is the only way to form a government.” of any type.”
The movement asked: “Why does (Hariri) persist in leaving bags vague and ambiguous in bag distribution, especially in Christianity? Is the president of the republic a constitutional partner in the formation of the government, or is his authority limited to signing the authorship decree? “And he added:” Do you understand the importance of forming a government in Lebanon absent from the Christian parliamentary blocs with participation? and trust? In a threat of not giving the government the confidence of the two most prominent Christian blocs.
The “movement” warned “of the danger of the exclusionary approach that the designated president is adopting in his dealings with the president of the republic and with interested parliamentary blocs.” And he believed: “This is the true objective of Hariri to raise the title of the third plus one, and that is the reason that prevents him from presenting a complete and clear government formation to the President of the Republic, and above all, it is necessary to obtain the confidence of the block (strong of Lebanon) “.
The current reiterated its saying that “it will not participate in the government, nor will it give it confidence in the foundations proposed by the designated president.” He also said that he “refuses to give the president-designate and his middle team plus one in government, because he will use it to prevent reforms, disrupt criminal scrutiny and stop all attempts to fight corruption.”