This is what we have, and there is no solution except the Sidr reforms and the recommendations of the International Monetary Fund

The Al-Akhbar newspaper wrote: Since the beginning of this week, the information that reached official officials regarding the position of Paris in the impasse in the formation of the government was crossed on the eve of Hariri’s meeting with Macron and his future. , and focused on some data that they do. It does not indicate any more serious and tangible change than is known The ambiguity surrounding a possible third visit to Macron to Beirut or the sending of an envoy to Beirut was maintained, which meant, until further notice, leaving the formation of the government in the hands of its two hard-to-understand creators:

1- Paris offends that all the Lebanese parties abandoned the French initiative and violated the promises they made to the French president on his second visit to Beirut, and had assured him of their commitment to implement the terms of his initiative before he later discovered that it had cheated. Since then, these parties have not had any counter-preparation, and have persisted in denying the initiative, starting with the most prominent of its provisions, which is the formation of a government of specialists since the overthrow of Mustafa Adib, who assumed the mandate. . On the eve of Macron’s arrival in Beirut on his second visit on August 31, he was deported less than a month later.

2- What surprises Paris, in light of its communication with the Lebanese parties, that they are drowning in the illusions that someone, or an international force, will rescue them at the last moment before the total collapse. Among them – say the French – are those who believe that the problem ends by itself, and therefore stick to its conditions and are not prepared for the slightest concession.

3- The French are not surprised by what they know about the Lebanese, throughout the decades of historical relations between the two countries, as in the crises of their tribulations and crises, which they tell those who trust the factors of time and they wait, and deliberately link their internal problems with thorny regional and international archives. The French believe that parties concerned about the current government crisis are meeting these two factors, but each of them is putting it on a different agenda: Hezbollah and those in their circles are awaiting the results of negotiations between the United States and the Iran and the possibility. to go back to the nuclear deal that would improve their conditions at home, instead of making costly concessions about their position in local and regional equations, and strengthening their bargaining position towards them. On the other hand, other parties, such as Hariri, Walid Jumblatt, parliamentarian Gebran Bassil and Samir Geagea, link these negotiations with their reflection on next year’s parliamentary and presidential elections, provided that these forces reach these two dates capable of imposing their conditions. . , armed with a strong negotiating position in turn. Thus, it is easy to understand the conditions that everyone exchanges to form a government that is supposed to exist before the arrival of these important requirements: the implications of the possible nuclear deal and the successive Lebanese constitutional elections.