After the confusion with the journalist Clara Juha and her lawyer husband … “Security Forces” clarifies

The General Directorate of Internal Security Forces – Public Relations Division issued the following communication:

Yesterday 01/03/2021, after a video about a problem between the journalist Clara Juha and the person in charge of ensuring traffic in the Samaan Gallery and the intervention of her husband circulated on social networks and the media, attorney Jimmy Hadchiti, it is important that the General Directorate clarifies the following:

First: Those who care about the homeland repeatedly ask us to stand firm against misleading media campaigns, as if what is required is to be a media platform and not a security institution whose objective is to achieve the right and maintain security and safety. order. Predators take advantage of opportunities, and in each incident they show a fragmentary image of the truth to invest it to their advantage and take advantage of it, especially through social networks.

Second: just as some media always blame the Internal Security Forces, knowing that in this way, and in these fateful circumstances, they are contributing to hitting the main pillar of the country, which is security.

Third: It is regrettable that some of the people in charge of applying justice and defending the oppressed and the truth, look provocatively and condescendingly at the security element that supervises the implementation of the laws, and intimidate the elements of the security forces. internal security during the performance of their duty instead of appreciating their efforts and sacrifices for the sake of the security and stability of the homeland.

Fourth: It was more efficient for the spouses, who were the subject of the problem, to respect the law and comply with the element by removing the car from the place, which obstructed the movement of traffic at the intersection of the Samaan Gallery, in order to provide the best example to his two children in the car.

Fifth: When investigating the platoon in question, it was clear that the media had parked her motor vehicle differently in front of the “Karout Mall” complex, preventing traffic, and when the policeman asked her to remove it from her place she She refused, considering she was waiting for her husband to finish shopping for some of the necessities, so she filmed the rape and then returned. He rolled him into the intersection without taking any action. Upon the return of her husband from the aforementioned compound after contacting him, he immediately went to the crossing (and if he left with his wife at that time, the problem would not have occurred) and began to insult the officer and accuse him of hitting his wife, then a cyclist came to attend to this problem, and he, in turn, was subjected by the lawyer to obscene words and pushed him. So the rider had to fend for himself.

During the investigation within the peloton, the lawyer again accused the cyclist of insulting the cyclist, which caused the latter’s reaction and an attempt to harm him, and he was prevented from doing so.

Based on the indication of the Judicial Power, the motorcyclist and the lawyer were detained at that time, and the signal and information component was left in exchange for two residence documents, so the Judicial Power returned and left the two detained under two residence documents the next day.

The General Directorate of Internal Security Forces will always remain interested in implementing the applicable laws and regulations. Calls on citizens not to be dragged behind rumors, false news or images and videos that do not reveal the whole truth, but reveal a part of it, and to extract the correct information from its source in the Internal Security Forces, the Public Relations Division.