Nasrallah: The Israeli threats are simply raising their voices, and the enemy is still standing on the man and half on the border.

The Secretary General of “Hezbollah”, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, spoke in a television interview broadcast by the stations “Al-Mayadeen” and “Al-Manar” under the title Public Dialogue. In response to a question about the possibility of US President Trump resorting to a military strike in his final days as US President, he said: “There is no precise data on the possibility of Trump doing this, but There is analysis related to Trump’s personality while he is angry and angry, indicating the concern of the main leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States for his anger and what he could do. Which side of the axis of resistance? “

He commented on Israeli threats that they are simply raising their voices, warning against this enemy at the same time and thinking of taking action. He noted: “There are approaches that say that the new US administration may have a different position regarding the resolution of the Palestinian problem, and perhaps return to the nuclear deal with Iran.”

He denied the existence of information about the possibility of a military matter that could happen. He also denied an Israeli landing in the Jiyeh area, as previously reported, and claimed that “the Israeli is still standing on a man and a text on the border.”

Nasrallah revealed that there was more than one party that informed him of information about plans to expose him to murder, especially in the run-up to the US elections, hinting at “permanent precautions because I am targeting an American and an Israeli.”

He accused Saudi Arabia of instigating his assassination, especially since the war in Yemen, and stressed that it is information he received. He linked this information to the visit of the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Muhammad bin Salman to the United States, and that the information he received indicates that the American agreed with the murder and that it was financed by Saudi Arabia. He revealed that this information he received “was from the east and west sides.”

Nasrallah revealed his repeated warnings to Soleimani about the need to be cautious, especially in their last meeting, which preceded the murder a week, stopping their joint work on sensitive files, between trials, difficulties, tears, joy and ambitions, “and this it generated a kind of brotherly relationship between us, and that’s why I miss him a lot. “

He also referred to the personality of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who was assassinated with Qassem Soleimani, describing him as the great leader. He believed that the American exit from Iraq was a victory, as was the victory over ISIS.

He explained what Soleimani offered to Palestine, saying that he had developed the relationship with the Palestinian factions, and the ways to support them, and that there were no red lines regarding logistical support to Gaza and the West Bank, from weapons to supplies, and everything. related to the manufacture of missiles, including Kornet missiles. , Revealing that the Kornet missiles changed the equation on the ground in the 2006 aggression, noting that “the Syrian Defense Ministry bought these missiles from Russia and took them as support from Syria later, and we used them in the July war and the Russians didn’t get mad at our use of them because these missiles earned a worldwide reputation. “

He continued: “I told Soleimani that it is out of courtesy that we must inform President Assad that we want, together with Soleimani, to deliver the Kornet missiles to the Gaza Strip, and this is what happened, and President al-Assad that does not it mattered. ” He stressed the availability of “full Iranian support for the Palestinian factions, without reservations,” referring to the worst ten years that the Palestinian factions have lived financially. Iranian support was absolute, politically, financially, logistically and emotionally for the Palestinian factions. “

He noted that “President al-Assad was not satisfied with Hamas’ position regarding what happened in Syria, but he was not bothered by our relationship with him.” He was not surprised by the Arab disappointment regarding the Palestinian issue, and that the normalization issue existed before it was officially announced. He explained his vision of what happened and said: “The mask fell and was revealed while the hypocrites left the ranks”, considering that “what happened is one of the positive signs when the ranks are distinguished, and because God does not give victory to a mixture, but gives it to his family. “

He addressed the Arab people, especially the Palestinians, saying: “Most of these regimes sold Palestine and it was a burden on them, so they needed time to tame it and create another enemy, Iran, after fighting battles against the Soviets in Afghanistan, but they did not fight for Palestine. ” He praised the “military capabilities of the brothers in the Gaza Strip now, especially that will, determination and determination are the foundation, and available to them.” And he declared: “The capacities of the resistance everywhere are excellent, the most important of which is the will and determination to confront.”

In response to a question about the Palestinians of the 48 lands and what it can tell them in the event of war, he said: “They are our people and they are the people who most aspire to the liberation of Palestine, and I refuse to call them Arabs of the 48 because they are Palestinian Arabs. ” A looming war could have the minds and hearts of the 48 Palestinians with us. “

Regarding his meeting with Ismail Haniyeh in the southern suburbs a while ago, he said: “Due to the events in Syria, the relationship between us has cooled off, but in my many meetings with him here in the suburb, we discussed many issues. , most of them strategic, including the issue of Syria, “waiting for the relationship between Hamas and Syria to return. “But it takes time.”

Sayyed Nasrallah denied “having spoken with Haniyeh on the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria”, noting that “this matter could be discussed further by the Iranian leadership.”