[ad_1]
Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah spoke in a televised interview titled Public Dialogue. In response to a question about the possibility of US President Trump resorting to launching a military strike in his final days as US President, he said: “There is no precise data on the possibility of Trump doing this. However, there are analyzes related to the personality of Trump, who is crazy and angry, pointing to the concern of senior leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States for his anger and what he could do, who asked that he handle himself with caution and precision at this stage so as not to divert any party from the axis of resistance.
He commented on the Israeli threats that they are simply raising their voice, warning against this enemy at the same time and thinking that it will take action. He noted: “There are approaches that say that the new US administration may have a different position regarding the resolution of the Palestinian problem, and perhaps return to the nuclear deal with Iran.”
He denied the existence of information about the possibility of a military matter that could happen. He also denied that there was an Israeli landing in the Jiyeh area, as previously reported, and claimed that “the Israeli is still standing on a man and a text at the borders.”
Nasrallah revealed that there was more than one party that informed him of information about plans to expose him to murder, especially in the run-up to the US elections, alluding to “permanent precautions because I am targeting an American and an Israeli.”
He accused Saudi Arabia of inciting his assassination, especially since the war in Yemen began, stressing that it is information he received, linking this information to the visit of the Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman to America, and that the information he received indicates that the American agreed to the assassination and it was financed by Saudi Arabia. He revealed that this information he received “was from the east and west sides.”
Nasrallah revealed his repeated warnings to Soleimani about the need to be cautious, especially in their last meeting, which preceded the murder a week, stopping their joint work on sensitive files, between trials, difficulties, tears, joy and ambitions, “and this it generated a kind of brotherly relationship between us, and that’s why I miss him a lot. “
He also referred to the personality of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who was assassinated with Qassem Soleimani, describing him as the great leader. He believed that the American exit from Iraq was a victory, as was the victory over ISIS.
He explained what Soleimani offered to Palestine, saying that he had developed the relationship with the Palestinian factions, and the ways to support them, and that there were no red lines regarding logistical support to Gaza and the West Bank, from weapons to supplies, and everything. related to the manufacture of missiles, including Kornet missiles. , Revealing that the Kornet missiles changed the equation on the ground in the 2006 aggression, noting that “the Syrian Defense Ministry bought these missiles from Russia and took them as support from Syria later, and we used them in the July war and the Russians didn’t get mad at our use of them because these missiles earned a worldwide reputation. “
He continued: “I told Soleimani that it is out of courtesy that we must inform President Assad that we want, together with Soleimani, to deliver the Kornet missiles to the Gaza Strip, and this is what happened, and President al-Assad that does not it mattered. ” He stressed the availability of “full Iranian support for the Palestinian factions, without reservations,” referring to the worst ten years that the Palestinian factions have lived financially. Iranian support was absolute, politically, financially, logistically and emotionally for the Palestinian factions. “
He noted that “President al-Assad was not satisfied with Hamas’ position regarding what happened in Syria, but he was not bothered by our relationship with him.” He was not surprised by the Arab disappointment regarding the Palestinian issue, and that the normalization issue existed before it was officially announced. He explained his vision of what happened and said: “The mask fell and was revealed while the hypocrites left the ranks”, considering that “what happened is one of the positive signs when the ranks are distinguished, and because God does not give victory to a mixture, but gives it to his family. “
He addressed the Arab people, especially the Palestinians, saying: “Most of these regimes sold Palestine and were a burden to them, so they needed time to tame it and create another enemy, Iran, after fighting battles against the Soviets in Afghanistan, but they didn’t fight for Palestine. ” He praised the “military capabilities of the brothers in the Gaza Strip now, especially that will, determination and determination are the foundation, and available to them.” And he declared: “The capacities of the resistance everywhere are excellent, the most important of which is the will and determination to confront.”
In response to a question about the Palestinians of the 48 lands and what it can tell them in the event of war, he said: “They are our people and they are the people who most aspire to the liberation of Palestine, and I refuse to call them Arabs of the 48 because they are Palestinian Arabs. ” A future, the minds and hearts of the 48 Palestinians could be with us. “
Regarding his meeting with Ismail Haniyeh in the southern suburbs a while ago, he said: “Due to the events in Syria, the relationship between us has cooled off, but in my many meetings with him here in the suburb, we discussed many issues. , most of them strategic, including the issue of Syria, “waiting for the relationship between Hamas and Syria to return. “But it takes time.”
Sayyed Nasrallah denied “having spoken with Haniyeh on the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria”, noting that “this matter could be discussed further by the Iranian leadership.”
“The axis of resistance has managed to achieve victories, and it is stronger than ever, compared to the American who spent 7 trillion dollars, as Trump revealed, but what is the result? America withdrew from Iraq,” he emphasized.
He declared that “revenge for the blood of the two martyrs Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis is a duty and a matter of loyalty to them.”
Asked about the role of Soleimani and “Hezbollah” in Syria, he said that on the second day of the fall of President Hosni Mubarak, Soleimani arrived in the suburb and was concerned about what the American was bringing regarding Syria. . Because they refused from the beginning to engage in a political dialogue, but because they were exploited in the global war that unfolded in Syria, “referring” to a political effort carried out by Iran in this field with political forces in Syria such as the Muslim Brotherhood and the State of Qatar, but everyone said that the regime is down. Assignment “.
He noted: “At that stage, the project was large for the region and the United States, Turkey and Qatar entered it. Its objective was to replace the regimes and bring others with popular acceptance, and also in relation to Israel, besieging and ending the the Lebanese and Palestinian resistance “.
He explained the reasons for participating in Syria: “We had to surrender or resist, so we and the rest of our friends had a clear choice.” Stressing that “the war in Syria was also due to Syria’s advantage, location, wealth and political role, not just its support for Palestine and its cause.” He revealed: “The steadfastness of the Syrian leadership, President Assad and the Syrian army is the base and the origin, and after that allies like us and the Iranians and Iraqis came, and five years later the Russians came, but we cannot deny the importance of the Russian role “. He stressed that President al-Assad did not leave Damascus despite the difficult situation until recently, but he was consistent and I did not notice any weakness in his personality.
Nasrallah spoke about the Iranian-Russian coordination, Soleimani’s march to Moscow, his meeting with Putin, and the discussion that took place between them on military matters, and that Putin told Soleimani as a result of this meeting that he agreed with what it offered militarily, and that it would provide assistance, and after that there was the Russian entry into Syria. And he considered that “Russia, after entering Syria, has returned to the global map.”
[ad_2]
