[ad_1]
Anton the boy wrote in “Akhbar Al-Youm”:
While some powers are still struggling to withdraw from deliberation the record of the Beirut port explosion and the truth associated with it, at any cost, in a more than clear manner, it is necessary to emphasize the need to accelerate the path of the truth, in order to preserve the rights of the right holders and of all the Lebanese people.
While drowning people are drowning in details related to the search for the original owner of the “ammonium nitrate” vessel, and other things that, while true, contribute to wasting a lot of time, in a country that has nothing absolutely.
‘Personal protection’
Instead of being distracted in vicious circles that were previously strengthened by the beneficiaries of these explosive materials over the years, with quantities of “camouflaged” official “self-protection” documents, it is necessary to promote the request for satellite images of the Port of Beirut, over the years. Extending from the year the materials entered Lebanon (i.e. 2013), to 2020.
Consequently, if the countries that possessed the images of the last August 4 explosion could justify that their satellites were not focused on our region, at the time of its occurrence (the explosion), but inevitably possessed a large number of images of satellite on what was happening in the port of Beirut during the seven extended years. Between 2013 and 2020, they reveal the smallest details, including what was happening in District 12. And who was actively involved? What if those substances (ammonium nitrate) were left unused, or vice versa? It can also determine the destination to which these flammable materials were being diverted, be it within the interior of Lebanon or perhaps in the regional context.
Cameras
An informed source stressed that “what is required is not limited to the need to request access to satellite images, but also to the images of the cameras installed inside the port of Beirut, and those found on the road leading to him in the capital. “
He called in an interview with the agency “Akhbar Al-Youm” to “emphasize that all goods of this type, which contain 34.7 percent of” nitrogen “, usually need an” End User “in the process of sale and use.
He added: “This is the first point that the investigations must address. In addition to clarifying the route of this commodity, in terms of its origin, and the destination it was going to enter.”
How and for whom?
The source noted that “the amount of these flammable materials decreased significantly during the seven years in which they were stored. But how? What are the trucks that I loaded? Who did you follow those trucks? And for the benefit of those who were ? Therefore, we must also return to the local chambers. “
He continued: “Any truck leaving Beirut port loaded with ammonium nitrate needs entry and exit documents, and a signature from the relevant official authorities. Why not examine these routes as well?”
Navigation
The source explained that “the satellites are able to show the movement of trucks within the port of Beirut during those years, and the images are already there. Even (the satellites) can determine the months or periods during which the combustible materials were not removed from the port. Therefore, it is useful to use their images. And images from local cameras showing movement outside (Beirut port). “
And he highlighted the “need to write to Interpol”, and to all the international organizations that investigated their teams on the ground after the explosion, including Americans, French and others, with an urgent request, to request photographs for the period between 2013 and 2014. Photographs from that period show who was removing these materials from the port of Beirut. Especially since internal opinions are in conflict between those who say they were used for the benefit of the revolutionaries in Syria and those who say they were used for the benefit of the Syrian regime forces.
He concluded: “If the competent Lebanese authorities actually prevented the ammonium nitrate ship from leaving the port of Beirut in the past, on the pretext that its structure was damaged and unfit for navigation, then how did Turkey allow, For example, sailing from the Turkish shores? This leads the investigation to also focus on these aspects, instead of Diluting time in what does not work “.
