The French judiciary decides on the verdicts of 14 defendants in the attack on Charlie Hebdo



[ad_1]

The French judiciary decides on the verdicts of 14 defendants in the attack on Charlie Hebdo

Today, Wednesday, the French judiciary will issue its verdicts on 14 defendants who appeared to support the planners of the 2015 terrorist attacks against the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish food store.

During the day, the Special Criminal Court of Paris will announce its verdict in this trial, which refers to three days of terror that shook France in January 2015.

read more

France .. New postponement of the trial of those accused of the January 2015 attacks

In the attacks, 17 people were killed, including 11 in the Charlie Hebdo newspaper on January 7, and four in a supermarket selling Jewish food on January 9, and two policemen were killed in these attacks.

However, prosecutors confirmed that these three terrorists, who were shot dead by security forces on January 9, 2015, were “nothing” without the defendants who are currently on trial. They demanded prison terms ranging from five years to life in prison.

The prosecution requested maximum sentences for two defendants allegedly “accomplices” in the attacks, namely Mohamed Belhassin, who was tried in absentia after his departure for Syria, and Ali Reza Polat, who was described as the “focus” of the preparations for the attack.

He also requested a 30-year prison sentence for the life of Boumediene, Amedi Coulibaly’s partner, who was fleeing, and twenty years against Mehdi Belhassen, who helped her out. Both were also tried in absentia.

The prosecution requested prison terms of between five and twenty years against the other ten defendants who allegedly provided weapons or equipment to the perpetrators of the attacks “with full knowledge of the objective of the jihadists,” perpetrators of the attacks, according to prosecutors.

In their last words on Monday, before the court began its deliberations after 54 days of discussion, these defendants, between 29 and 68 years old, affirmed that they had precedents, but not of acts related to terrorism, and that “no they had nothing to do “with the attacks.

The attorneys for the defendants asked the court to “not give in to fear” looking for “suspects at any cost” in an atmosphere of great terrorist threat in the country.

Source: AFP



[ad_2]