[ad_1]
The Finance and Budget Committee is expected to continue discussing the government’s plan, in a session to be held on Wednesday. In the past few days, he had held two discussion sessions around him in Parliament.
What is remarkable is that the discussion that took place during the previous two sessions of the committee concluded that the state is primarily responsible for the losses inflicted on the Lebanese, and it is regrettable that it is in its plan, shirking responsibility, and decided to punish those They have nothing to do with what happened soon or far, and decided not to pay for the depositors of their stock market, but to compensate for the losses of the accounts of the losers themselves. She is also the lead officer, because she is the one who financed herself, took the money, spent it and wasted it, and is responsible through her departments, especially the Central Bank and the Committee on Banking Supervision, for supervising the banks and compel them to keep depositors’ money and not take any action that threatens these deposits. Consequently, he waived this responsibility.
This matter, according to information from “The Republic”, was the subject of consensus among the deputies to refuse to accept it, because the state in this way decides intentionally or not about the future, when the state deliberately deprives the depositor, be it expatriate or in your home, from your deposit, it becomes your right to fear it and lose confidence in it, and therefore how can you persuade it to bring your money to Lebanon, and before that trust you again?
The information adds that direct parliamentary statements addressed to the government revolve around the “sin committed by the government” against depositors’ money. The information adds: You won’t find a single investor approaching you, who will trust you yet? And on this policy that you follow, who will invest a penny in the country? And you say that 10% of depositors are the only targets, these depositors are the owners of the money, they invest and build companies, institutions and factories, and they work the currency. Those who bring the money, if you hit them, what is your alternative? So you always sing that Lebanon’s wealth is $ 8 billion in remittances from expats, and now you decided to hit expats, rather than encourage them. In your approach to this, what do you say to these people? And who among them, due to his policy towards them, will consider transferring a penny to Lebanon?
[ad_2]
