[ad_1]
The Future Bloc saw: “Callers are calling Of all the political and sectarian efforts in defense of justice and the judiciary, only because the national leaders and the national religious authority resorted to warning against the insult to the position of the prime minister, and to prosecute the current prime minister in the case of the criminal bombing of the port of Beirut and its surrounding population.
And he continued, in a statement: “Some of those who care about the rights of victims and the afflicted have adopted the sectarianization of the Nakba as if it were the exclusive right of a party or a group, and began to manipulate the strings of the incitement and refer to the Sunni community and its references as if it was or is alone violating justice and the law. ” These references emerged from a suspicious path, from the difficulty of isolating it from political malice and the continuous attempts to overthrow the formula of national consensus and the successive calls to impose sectarian standards on the country’s political administration.
The bloc asserted: “Yes, there is a plan that we will not allow to pass, neither by the judiciary nor by anything else, to target the position of prime minister. A retaliation plan for the Taif Agreement that achieved effective participation in power and ended a period of domination and exclusivity in the management of its institutions. A plan that evokes the coup literature of the late 1980s, to impose it on political and national life more than thirty years after its fall. Yes, there is a plan to contain and isolate the first site of the Sunni community in Lebanon, either through intimidation against the prime minister and accusations against him in the case of the port, or through intimidation against the political authorities who are they took over the prime minister for the last ten years, and the House of Representatives deposited a book listing former prime ministers. On the list of those responsible for the port explosion. “
And he continued: “They allow themselves the right to defend their sites, sects, jobs and components, and they also allow themselves to disrupt the country for years and years, without worrying about material losses and vital and economic repercussions to ensure opportunities for the most strongmen of his sect reach the presidency, “noting that”They have the right to suspend the formation of governments, as a waste in the eyes of the brother-in-law, or under the guise of imposing standards that allow sect leaders to appoint ministers, elect ministerial portfolios, and stick with the third-party bloc, even if they Standards force them to bite the actions of other sects. And theThey soon gather their supporters in front of the entrances to the Republican Palace to protect the post of the first presidency and mark red lines in the face of popular movements and peaceful objections to the superior policies of the State.
And he believed that “the series of exclusive rights of leaders, leaders and presidencies to defend their positions is permissible for everyone without exception, whether in the confrontation of the judiciary, or in violation of the law, or in heresy against the constitution, or in transgressing the limits of authority, or in covering military intervention in wars “. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which led to the suspension of the appointments of the fourth category of successful members of the civil service and the release of religious jealousy to protect this governor or that employee, “confirming that”All of this is legitimate, legal, legal and patriotic, and does not fall into the category of sectarian and sectarian mobilization … One thing that sparked nervousness about justice and the judiciary, and the temple merchants who dominate the trade with the pain of the citizens and compete for the destruction of Beirut and the pain of its people and inhabitants, to score political points against this or that group. Stating that “One thing they placed in the category of sectarian protection and pushed the boundaries of the judiciary is to defend the office of prime minister, who took the indictment against him as an opportunity to shoot various government references.
He continued: “All their houses are broken glass and Rayan sectarian above all the rooftops, but they are not like the smashed, beaten and overburdened houses and roofs of Beirut. If so, they would have stopped hindering the formation of the government and agreed to the formation of the designated president who rises above the party quota system and is nominated to save. ” Beirut is in the grip of devastation and devastation, and when they were entrenched behind sectarian and partisan quotas, to block the roads to rebuild Beirut and support its people. ”
The group’s statement concluded: “We are the victims in Beirut. We are the families of the victims and the guardians of the blood.” To those below, but not on the basis of a political and fragmented discretionary justice ”.
