[ad_1]
“Article 230” protects Internet companies from accountability, and Trump had called for the article to be removed after Twitter and Facebook platforms placed warning signs on their posts, especially during the upcoming presidential election. carried out on November 3.
Trump said on Twitter: “Article 230, which is a gift from the United States to protect ‘tech giants’ from liability (and they are the only companies in America that have it; a corporate welfare regime) is a serious threat to our national security and electoral integrity. ”
Section 230, which is a gift of US liability protection to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America to have it – corporate welfare!), Is a serious threat to our National Security and Electoral Integrity. Our country can never be safe and protected if we leave it standing …
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2020
He added in an accompanying tweet: “It is therefore dangerous and unfair that Article 230 is not completely removed from the NDAA. I will certainly be forced to veto the law.”
Section 230, which is a gift of US liability protection to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America to have it – corporate welfare!), Is a serious threat to our National Security and Electoral Integrity. Our country can never be safe and protected if we leave it standing …
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2020
Trump affirmed that there was “fraud” in the elections and launched a campaign through his social platforms, coinciding with his judicial efforts to challenge the electoral results.
Twitter and Facebook in particular defended placing warning signs in the president’s posts that they were willing to defend his policies, “protecting themselves from disinformation” and “not calling for violence,” while officials accused them of targeting Republican posts and exempt Democrats from the same deal. The companies have repeatedly denied this, noting that they have added similar tags to accounts belonging to Democratic Party officials.
[ad_2]
