The unit of standards causes a damped tension between the



[ad_1]

The ruling parties continue the quota process, forgetting the interest and luck of the Lebanese citizen

The motto of “unity of norms”, raised by the head of the “Free Patriotic Movement”, the son-in-law of the Lebanese president, deputy Gebran Bassil, warns of a headline for his objection to the path of government formation, as mentioned in the number today from the Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper. The promises made to the inside are inconsistent with the promises made to the outside. “Under the heading” Unity of norms “several elements are included;” The most important of them is the refusal to dedicate any ministry to any sect, and the most important is respect the political weights of each component and the options of the people in parliament “, says the adviser to the head of the Movement, Antoine Constantine.
It seems clear that the movement’s demand not to dedicate any ministry to any sect is directed against Basilio’s allies in front of his opponents, according to the newspaper, specifically “Hezbollah”, which supported its ally, the president of the Lebanese parliament Nabih Berri, before any attempt to withdraw the Ministry of Finance from the Shiites, reaching an agreement to exclude it. One of the conditions for the rotation in the ministries that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri is working on, in exchange for Bassil’s demand to keep the Ministry of Energy, is also part of the “standards unit” in the rotation. There is contradictory information about the agreement that the parliamentary blocs should appoint their ministers or not, which is what the “Free Patriot” says is an agreement between Hariri and the “Shiite duo” (“Hezbollah” and “Amal Movement”) and the head of the “Progressive Socialist Party” Walid Jumblatt. The Movement of the Future rejects it.
Hezbollah is silent and limits its comments to statements by its officials on the need to speed up the formation of the government, without going into details, while a source close to the “Shiite duo” told “Asharq Al-Awsat” that Bassil was intensified after the imposition of US sanctions against him and his reactivation of a lawsuit. The Standards Unit “aims to” blow up the agreement between the two parties and Hariri, the most important of which are the two parties that get the Ministry of Finance, “highlighting that” the path of formation was positive before that, and just need to put the names “.
In the line of the Future Movement, MP Muhammad al-Hajjar considers that Basil’s escalation, after it was agreed to grant the Ministry of Finance to the Shiites, is nothing more than a justification of obstruction to show his audience that he is working to obtain their rights and return things to what they were in the previous stages, according to the Middle East. .
Al-Hajjar puts the silence of Hezbollah on the position of its ally in the “door of accommodation” that the party adopts during this period, after the sanctions against Bassil, ruling out at the same time that it would reach the point that the “Shiite duo” waive the requirement of the Ministry of Finance. He denied that the parties have nominated the ministers, saying: “The days will prove that Hariri is the one who will appoint the ministers.”
On the other hand, the “Free Patriotic Movement” refuses to say that the position of its president points to a specific party. Constantine says that “this matter was not discussed with (Hezbollah). Because the position is tentative. He explained to Al-Sharq al-Awsat that “the lawsuit (the standards unit) is not directed against anyone, and is a positive proposal by nature that aims to achieve justice between all components, and prevent further sectarianism or return to try to marginalize a certain group, similar to the days of the control of the Syrian regime. “
He noted that “if the agreement is that the Shiites obtain the Ministry of Finance, as long as this matter is not usually enshrined, then we will be among the facilitators.” He stressed “the need to distinguish between assignment and authorship”, after the “movement” withheld its votes for Hariri, and explained that “authorship is subject to the balance of power in parliamentary blocs, and the president-designate should consult with them to gain confidence in parliament. “
He believed that “Hariri, who we recognize as representative of the Sunni component, tried to isolate us by establishing a new norm outside the constitution, which is that the President of the Republic represents Christians, the Speaker of Parliament represents Shiites and the Prime Minister represents the Sunnis, after forging an alliance with the Shiite duo, the Chairman of the Progressive Socialist Party, representatives of the Marada Movement and a group of the Marada Movement. Christians … We do not doubt the Charter of the Christian Parliament … But if Hariri believes that his votes are enough, both politically and politically, he may go to training without us.

Source: Middle East



[ad_2]