[ad_1]
[앵커]
The government held a meeting of the State Council today (1st) and voted to announce a special law to donate emergency funds. Those who were willing to donate decided to donate if they did not apply. Today, at Captain Choi Jong-hyuk’s presentation, let me point out the news related to the donation of disaster relief funds.
[기자]If you do not apply for disaster aid within 3 months of the application date, you will be deemed willing to donate. The online application starts on the 11th, so if you don’t submit the application before August 11th, it will be automatically donated. Or, upon request, you can donate some and receive only the remaining amount, or you can donate later.
Donations are being made in many sectors of society. Jo Gye-jong said he will donate more than 5,000 emergency disaster relief funds, including members of the Central Assembly and the headquarters governor. Seocho-gu, Seoul also said that all officials above level 5 will participate in the donation. Private companies also participate. Meritz Financial Group also decided to voluntarily donate 2,700 employees of its affiliates.
While President Moon Jae-in is also expected to donate, the Democratic Party continues to express its willingness to donate. In fact, it would be nice if the party stood up and declared, “All members of our party will be donated.” This is because there is a possibility that it will be reflected as a “controlled donation” forcing a donation. Therefore, donations are encouraged, but the final decision is left to the discretion of the individual.
[장제원/미래통합당 의원 (지난달 28일) : 캠페인과 정책적 수단을 헷갈려 하는 이런 식으로 국가가 정책을 펴면 안 됩니다. 안 받는 사람 또 기부하는 사람은 착한 국민입니까? 그다음에 받는 분들은 미안해서 이것을 어떻게 받습니까? 이렇게 국민들로부터 줘 놓고 ‘일부 국민들은 이거 기부해 달라, 이거 반납해 달라’ 이렇게 얘기하면 저는 맞지 않다고 생각합니다.]This criticism seems to be possible enough. Therefore, donations to disaster aid must be made through the voluntary participation and consideration of members of society. It should not be forced. It should not be that the president and senior officials, or corporate executives, donate, so government officials and employees should follow suit. It means there is no need for pressure or pressure.
So, for example, while having a tea party meeting and having lunch, when Sung-Tae Park orders “I am Jjajangmyeon”, it is the manager’s choice. Even if you only eat Jjajangmyeon, you can ask for Jjajangmyeon for people who are full of pears, and for those who want to eat soup, you can ask for Champon. I’m going to tell you more about the disaster relief fund and more.
Below, we summarize the results of the analysis of the election of the 21st National Assembly by the Legislative Survey of the National Assembly. The turnout rate in the 21st general election was 66.2%, the highest since the 14th general election in 1992. In particular, the prediction that turnout would be low due to the aftermath of Corona 19 was completely lost. The Legislative Research Bureau of the National Assembly provided various antecedents that could have led to high electoral participation. First, it is an election held at the center of the President’s presidency and has the characteristics of an interim evaluation of the current government. What was shown was evaluated.
In particular, they also analyzed that the confrontation between Young and Honam led to high participation. Precisely, the consolidation of the conservative and progressive camps has increased, and the voters of the supporters of the Democratic Party Honam and the supporters of the United Yeongnam Party have come to the vote. As you can see, Honam’s pre-voting rate exceeded 30%, while Jeonnam registered 35%. On the other hand, Yeongnam remained in the 20% range. Yeongnam voters, who were encouraged by this, were said to have left the main election as a vote. In terms of total voter turnout, Daegu was higher than Gwangju and Jeonnam and Gyeongnam recorded the same turnout, so voter turnout was actually higher in Yeongnam. As a result, it is observed that if the confrontation between these factions becomes stronger, it can eventually lead to the strengthening of regionalism.
[고 노무현/당시 새천년민주당 부산 북강서을 후보 : 지역대결의 정치가 이 나라를 망치고 있습니다. 지역구도 때문에 작대기만 꽂아도 국회의원이 되고 영남에서는 대통령이 호남에 가면 구의원도 안 되고 호남의 대통령은 이 부산에 오면 구의원도 되지 않는 이런 절름발이 정치가 되고 있습니다. 그래서 우리 정치가 망하고 나라가 흔들리고 있습니다. 여러분.]The Legislative Research Service analyzed that the sweeping of the seats by the huge bipartisan was the result of the growing confrontation between the two camps. The seats of the Democratic and United Party parties, plus the proportional seats of each satellite party, are 283 seats, representing 94.3% of the 300 seats. It is the higher of the two main seats since democratization in 1987. Consequently, unlike the 20th National Assembly, which launched as a tripartite system and functioned as a multi-party system, the 21st National Assembly is likely to operate as a bipartisan system centered on the Democratic Party, which occupies three fifths of the seats. In the process, the confrontation intensified and the possibility of a physical conflict or the collapse of the National Assembly shown by the 20th National Assembly cannot be ruled out.
Ironically, the situation is due to the semi-embedded proportional system introduced to guarantee parity of minority parties and the equivalence of votes. It is precisely because of the great tricks of the great party called satellite party. The Legislative Research Ministry said it should make a supplement to prevent the satellite party from appearing, and suggested Germany’s “Bavarian state election model” as an alternative. It is a method of determining the seat by adding the votes for the district and the votes for the political party. The upcoming general elections are expected to be in no hurry and the 21st generation should prioritize supplementation of the electoral system in the first National Assembly.
I will arrange the presentation. < 긴급재난지원금 '관제기부' 우려 속 잇따르는 기부 행렬 >
[ad_2]
