“Failure of the real estate policy, 5 · 18 radical suppression”



[ad_1]

    The controversy over the real estate policy of the Moon Jae-in administration against the radical suppression of martial law forces during the May 18 Democratization Movement.  Manpyeong (top) posted by Maeil newspaper on the website on May 19, and martial law forces hitting fallen citizens during the Democratization Movement on May 18 (bottom).  Yunhap news

The controversy over the real estate policy of the Moon Jae-in administration against the radical suppression of martial law forces during the May 18 Democratization Movement. Manpyeong (top) posted by Maeil newspaper on the website on May 19, and martial law forces beating fallen citizens during the Democratization Movement on May 18 (bottom). Yunhap news

The controversy is that the Moon Jae-in administration’s real estate policy is seen as a controversy over the airborne troops suppressing the May 18 Democratization Movement. The press has been clarifying, but the criticism has not faded.

On the 22nd, the Maeil Shinmun daily in the Daegu area published a statement about Maeil Heipyeong (manpyeong) on ​​its website on March 19. This man-pyeong criticizes the government’s real estate policy, describing the personification of the construction fee, property tax, and tax tax as a soldier with a club and beating a landlord for more than 900 million won. When the cartoon came out, it was criticized because it was suspected of being painted, as it was based on a photograph of an airborne squadron member who had been radically suppressed at the time of May 18.

El Maeil Shinmun said: “The violence of increasing property taxes, taxes and construction fees due to the failure of the Moon Jae-in government’s real estate policy was noted.” It was based on content. ”

He said: “We fully sympathize with the historicity and weight of the Gwangju Democratization Movement, and we are also trying to share the pain,” he said. “There was no intention to undermine the Gwangju Democratization Movement and its spirit.”

Despite the clarification from Diario Maeil, organizations related to May 18 continued to be strongly criticized. The 518 Memorial Foundation and the 3 organizations related to the 518 (grieving family, wounded society and constricted wounded society) said: “It seems that the purpose of the man-pyeong is criticism of state affairs, but Gwangju citizens who found him had no choice but to recall the pain of 41 years ago “It was an irresponsible act to heal the deep wounds of May 18,” he criticized.

“Even with this criticism, the Maeil newspaper is consistent in making excuses without a sincere apology or reflection,” he said. “With a sincere apology, we must immediately replace the manpyeong writer and come up with a plan to prevent it from happening again.” They stressed that, as if taking into account that Maeil Shinmun is a media company owned by the Catholic Archdiocese of Daegu, “I will share this content with the Holy See and the national and foreign media.”

The Maeil Shinmun union also called for responsible action by management, saying: “You have crossed the line that must not be crossed.” The union side said: “Carrying out violent scenes that will live in someone’s memory and using them as a tool to criticize the regime is like an act of blasphemy against the victims of the Gwangju Democratization Movement and their grieving families.” .

Reporter Jang Joo-young [email protected]




[ad_2]