[ad_1]
Promotion of large-scale property registration to eradicate real estate speculation
Civil service registry level 4 or higher current Public level 1 or higher
“To be more effective, we need to expand the scope of property disclosure”
“It should be backed by anti-corruption countermeasures on behalf of brothers and sisters.”
[앵커]
As the ruling governing party decided to review the property records of all civil servants to prevent public servants from speculating in real estate, there was an emergency for mid- and lower-ranking civil servants. To increase the effectiveness of property registration for all public officials, it is noted that it is necessary to expand the disclosure of property and prepare a complementary measure for corruption on behalf of the middle name. Reporter Lee Jong-soo on the report. To eradicate property speculation triggered by the ‘LH crisis’, the ruling government party plans to first promote property registration for real estate-related officials and expand property registration to all public officials as the next step. The current Public Service Ethics Law requires level 4 or higher public officials and executives and employees of public service-related organizations to register their property, and level 1 or higher public officials to disclose their property. If all public officials are required to register their property, the number of targets is 1.5 million, including the total of 11.13,800 public officials, including the legislative, administrative and judicial branches, plus 410,000 employees of public institutions, including public companies. and quasi-governmental organizations. they are more than one. If the property registration system for civil servants is fully expanded, it is expected to be effective in suppressing corruption, such as speculation, by reporting changes to the civil servants ethics committee each year after property registration. However, to further increase effectiveness, experts agree that the scope of disclosure limited to Level 1 or higher should be expanded and strong punishment should be imposed for false records. In addition, it is noted that since property registration is limited to the person, spouse and direct relatives, countermeasures against corruption should be supported on behalf of a brother, spouse or relative. Experts believe that the ethics committee of public officials should carefully examine the contents of the property register to determine whether there has been an unreasonable accumulation of property. YTN Jongsoo Lee[[email protected]]is.