[ad_1]
Time management was difficult due to the problem requiring data and calculation skills.
The situation, relatively critical VS was difficult to cross
Operation of the legal journal passes prediction system … Automatic scoring when participating
In the third period, the response to the situational judgment area was relatively modest and opinions that it was not easy were mixed.
First, the general trend of data interpretation was assessed similarly to last year. In the area of data analysis last year, there were many opinions that there was a great variation in difficulty between problems, and there were several candidates who mentioned a lack of time.
Regarding this data analysis test, candidate A said: “There was a great variation in difficulty between the questions. The easy ones were solved too easily and the hard ones took too long. This data analysis appears to have been an important test of the ability to choose a problem to rule out. “
Examinee B said: “There seems to be a lot of cheating in general. There were also quite a few problems that seemed to solve the situational judgment problem. I also felt a bit similar to the legislative test. “
In particular, there were many opinions about wasting time, as a number of questions were presented that required quick and accurate calculation skills. Examinee C said: “There is no problem finding the answer with Eorimsan, and the calculation was complicated, so it took too long. It wasn’t the past, it was a guy close to the practice test. Candidates who were weak in the calculations would have been very difficult. “
Candidate D said: “The problem was that time was shorter than difficult. It is difficult to convey the idea that this is a problem that can be solved in time. There are a lot of problems that I can’t read correctly because I don’t have enough time. “
Examinee E said: “There were too many traps. I think it was not with the intention of being right, but with the intention of being wrong. Personally, I think this year was more difficult than the previous one ”.
In the case of the judgment on the situation, the evaluation of the perceived difficulty of the examinees was divided. In the case of candidate F, it was the side that said “I was very good.” However, he said, “It seems that the above issues were so difficult that it felt relatively easy to judge the situation. Still, I wish I had done a bit more than the previous release last year. “
Candidate G said: “The questionnaire that I used to think was difficult, but it was quite good, but there was a trap that caused errors in the problem of the legal text, and it seems that there was a bit of difficulty.”
Candidate H said: “I think situational judgment is a subject with a large score deviation depending on the type change. Personally, I think this test was more difficult than last year. There are quite a few problems that have not been solved correctly. “
In the case of last year, as in the data analysis, in the area of situational judgment, there was a variation in the difficulty between problems, and in particular, there were many evaluations that the weight of the questionnaire problem was large and the difficulty of the problem itself was very serious.
The fifth-grade diplomatic and public loan candidate screening test is scheduled to screen 348 people, 22 fewer than last year’s 370, but the number of applicants increased significantly from 12,595 to 15,066. Consequently, the average competition rate also jumped from 34.1 to 1 to 43.3 to 1. It is expected that the results of this exam, which took place amid fierce competition due to the increase in the number of applicants, are announced on April 7.
On the other hand, Diario Legal operates a ‘pass prediction system’ again this year. Existing level 5 public loans and diplomatic candidate screening tests, as well as local talent level 7 apprentice screening tests, are raising expectations.
Even last year, when it was difficult to predict the passing line due to various variables, such as a mixed difficulty assessment for an issue, a drop in test rate, and a sharp drop in constitutional failures, the approval prediction system of the legal journal ” hit ” in most serials or within the margin of error (± 0.83 points).
Candidates who want to know their own feelings can access the home page of the law journal after the exam on day 6, click on the pop-up window or the banner of the pass prediction system and accurately display their real answers for each subject according to procedure. Once the answer is entered, it cannot be modified, so special attention is required.
When entering the answer into the acceptance system, it is automatically graded, which reduces the inconvenience of manual qualification and, above all, you can quickly check the correct answer agenda confirmed by the legal journal through participation in the system of Law magazine prediction ahead of HR Office of Innovation correct answer agenda release.
The time available to score varies by area. The constitution of the first period and the area of linguistic logic, and the area of data interpretation of the second period can be scored immediately from 17:10, which is the end of the test, but it is expected that the judgment area The situation of the third period is qualified around 18:00.
Also, since it is the correct answer from the legal journal, it may be different from the correct answer from the Ministry of Personnel Innovation. If it is different from the correct answer schedule disclosed by the HR Innovation Ministry, it will be corrected and scored immediately, and even if it has already been scored, it will be automatically corrected.
Again this year, the legal journal pass prediction system will not reveal the expected pass line, but will proceed with a personalized service that informs only individual participants. This is in line with the purpose of avoiding horse racing predictions to insure students and operating for the convenience of test takers only.
Participants in the legal magazine’s pass prediction system are emailed to ‘pass confirmation’, ‘final pass’, ‘pass priority’, ‘trial reservation’, ‘next opportunity’, etc.
The prediction system is scheduled to enter service at 5:10 pm on the 6th and close around the 10th. However, the period of operation may change depending on circumstances such as the number of participants. Since the candidate’s career is an important time after the first exam, he will be notified whether he is satisfied or not as soon as possible as soon as the analysis is completed.
Copyright © Legal Journal Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited
