Jae-in Moon, Miae Chu, Seokyeol Yoon, Kyungsim Jung … 靑 The petition bulletin board is currently in political battle [한승곤의 정치수첩]



[ad_1]

靑 National Board of Petitions … Professor Kyung-Shim Chung agreed to dismiss the first trial court for more than 300,000
Seok-yeol Yoon said goodbye, Mi-ae Chu returned to trust, etc.

Notice board of the national petition of the Blue House.  Photo = Capture of the petition's bulletin

Notice board of national petitions of the Blue House. Photo = Capture of the petition bulletin

[아시아경제 한승곤 기자] “I am asking the indictment of the court of political affairs”, “The Democratic Party must impeach Yun Suk-yeol!”

The Blue House National Petition bulletin board has become a bulletin board for politics. Most of the 200,000 motions petitions that can be answered by the Blue House include impeachment of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and the confidence of Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae.

In addition, when the court cited the request for suspension of the execution of the effect of the disciplinary provision, which Yoon had filed with the court alleging that his disciplinary provision was unfair, a request for judicial reform arose, stipulating that the judiciary was redundant. Instead of petitions for civil petitions large and small in our lives, the fierce disputes of politics are moving to the Cheong Wa Dae petition bulletin board.

Indictment petition before the court of the first trial, Professor Kyung-Shim Chung of Tong Yang University.  Photo = Capture of the bulletin board of the national petition

Indictment petition to the first trial court, Professor Kyung-Shim Chung of Tong Yang University. Photo = Capture of the bulletin board of the national petition

Petitions that received more than 300,000 consents as of the 26th include △ removal of Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, removal of attorney general Yoon Seok-yeol, △ re-election of Justice Minister Chu Miae.

On the 23rd, a petition emerged titled ‘I Request the Indictment of Jung Kyung-shim’s (Jung-yeop Lim, Seong-su Kwon, Sun-hee Kim) First Trial Courts.’ ‘ The petitioner insisted on judicial reform. Furthermore, Professor Jeong criticized the judiciary, saying that his entire life was denied.

The petitioner said: “Today’s petition is not the right to be exercised by the Blue House and the administration directly, but must be carried out by the legislature on behalf of the people, but the Blue House and the government are also responsible for the important task of ‘judicial reform’, so I publish this petition. ” He explained the background.

First, the prosecution in the process of mandatory investigation and separate investigation of all those related to the former Minister of Justice Cho Kook and his family for political purposes, registered all the documents related to the minor’s entrance examination, and in the case to charge that all the documents presented during the entrance exam were falsified. On the other hand, the three judges recognized and accepted all the claims of the prosecution ”.

“As a result of today’s ruling, a person’s life was completely unfair. The judiciary, which did not traffic drugs, and which was generous with drunk driving and the change of driver, decided that all the admission documents that denied the life of a person were falsified. “I want to ask the court if it is true that he was tried according to the conscience of the constitution.”

National Blue House Petition Urging Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol to Dismiss.  Photo = Capture of the Notice Board of National Petitions

National Blue House Petition Urging Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol to Dismiss. Photo = Capture of the Notice Board of National Petitions

Furthermore, in a petition for the purpose of removing President Yoon on the 27th of last month, the petitioner insisted that “Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol must be removed as a procedure and subject to severe punishment through a thorough investigation, as the reasons have already been revealed to the world. ”

He also urged that “all prosecutors who protest against the deserved measures of Minister Chu Mi-ae should resign. I hope they are determined to protect Minister Chu Mi-ae, who is leading the front line of the prosecution reform.”

On the other hand, on the 17th a petition was raised entitled “We must impeach President Moon Jae-in who violated the constitutional spirit and undermined the rule of law.” The petitioner insisted: “We must impeach President Moon Jae-in, who has violated the constitutional spirit and undermined the rule of law.”

Then he argued: “The two months of disposition of the fiscal general in exercise, whose mandate is guaranteed by the constitution, for two months due to disciplinary action, is in fact the control of the prosecutor to avoid the investigation of the living power by creating a general botanist and to make the prosecution a servant of the regime.

Petition asking for the confidence of the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae to be restored.  Photo = Photo = Capture of the notice board of the National Petition

Petition asking for the confidence of the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae to be restored. Photo = Photo = Capture of the notice board of the National Petition

Citizens showed mixed reactions when a petition containing sharp political policy appeared on the petition’s bulletin board. Kim Mo, a 30-year-old office worker, said: “You can’t just ask for life on the petition bulletin board, but I think you can request politically sensitive content.”

On the other hand, there are claims that cannot be understood. Mr. Lee, a 40-year-old office worker, noted: “I want each party or person to speak about political petitions if they are party members. How many cases of school violence and other urgent petitions are there?” He then criticized: “It’s like a political bulletin board, not a petition bulletin board.”

President Moon Jae-in and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol [이미지출처=연합뉴스]

President Moon Jae-in and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol [이미지출처=연합뉴스]

Meanwhile, regarding President Yoon’s return to work, politicians are heading for a political battle beyond the petition bulletin board situation. In particular, the ruling and opposition parties are expressing strong disagreement over President Moon’s apology on the 25th of the court’s decision against President Yoon.

Furthermore, the Democratic Party appreciated President Moon’s apology. He also clarified the culmination of the institutional reform of the Office of the Prosecutor without setbacks. In a briefing on the 25th, Democratic Party spokesman Kang Seon-woo said: “It is an expression of a responsible position as a person in charge of human resources and a willingness to complete the reform of the prosecution service.” I will continue. “

People’s Power spokesperson Kim Eun-hye commented on the day that President Moon’s apology was “a sloppy apology from the pre-acquisition ceremony.” Spokesman Kim criticized: “What does an apology mean as the person in charge of human resources?” And “Is it a heartfelt debt to Secretary Chu Mi-ae, or is it anger towards President Yoon, who investigated the living power after hearing the president’s words.”

He dismissed it saying: “It is read with the will and determination to respect the court’s decision, but to stimulate control of the prosecution”, and “to apologize because it would have been better not to.

Reporter Han Seung-gon [email protected]




[ad_2]