[종합]”Promoting judicial reform” Seok-Yeol Yoon returned to work … Democratic Party with war, criticism of ‘treasure’

“I have to find something to do so that the president does not feel alone.”
“A judgment annulled by the residence of the president, this is a clear violation of the separation of powers”
“The Democratic Party must be firmly determined and take the initiative”
Democratic Party returns to President Yoon’s job … Criticism of the judiciary ‘judicial reform’ movement

[아시아경제 한승곤 기자] When the court cited a request for suspension of the application of the effect of disciplinary action against Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae by Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, a fierce reaction emerged to the purpose of the reform of the judiciary focused on the ruling party. Also, among Democratic Party supporters, views are spreading that the Democratic Party should push for court reform after prosecution reform.

Announcer Kim Eo-joon accuses the judge of being a “judge” in his broadcast, while Democratic Party lawmakers have come to an opinion that “let’s push for judicial reform.” It is interpreted as a desire to reform the court by preparing and reviewing legislation related to a large number of seats. In connection with this, a sitting vice president stands trial to criticize the reforms as intimidating, and the political wave surrounding President Yoon’s return to office is growing.

In an article posted on his Facebook page on the 25th, Im Jong-seok, a former presidential secretary, criticized: “The attitude of the prosecution and the interpretation of the court give off a very unknown sense of chosen people and a very familiar smell of interests. created “.

“We don’t follow the facts and the truths. We make up the case after making political judgments. We don’t see a distinction between what we should do and what we should not do,” he said. “Now, the prosecution and the court are doing it without hesitation. He insisted.

He said, “I gave them tools and ran errands, but they exercise them as if they created them themselves.” “I feel so miserable, helpless and irresponsible to see myself.”

“I have to find something to do so that the president does not feel alone. Let’s start swearing on the wall. Let’s not leave painful regrets again,” he concluded. Currently, Mr. Lim is in charge of the president’s special diplomatic and security affairs.

Democratic Party lawmaker Shin Dong-geun called for judicial reform through his Facebook. It is interpreted to mean that there is a problem with the court, citing President Yoon’s request to suspend the execution of the disciplinary action.

Representative Shin said: “As an alliance of privileged groups, we will systematically build democratic and civil control through the systematic and powerful promotion of intensive judicial reform and judicial reform against the strong resistance of legal cartels to adhere to criminal powers and judicial. “I’m going to.”

Also, member Min Hyung-bae from the same party said, “A trial that tears down the president’s house, this is a clear violation of the separation of powers.” He was blamed. He noted: “How can the judgment of the three judges be more rational than the decision of the disciplinary committee?”

“It seems that there are not one or two fundamental questions as if the judge can make a decision that has more advantages than the family of the president through a trial and, consequently, if the judiciary is involved in the state administration, etc. ” As a result, government officials who have not been elected to the national operating system are shaking wildly. “

“It is too irresponsible for citizens to come forward again by candlelight, so the National Assembly has no choice but to get to the place where the delegated representatives of the authority of the sovereign citizens of this country meet,” he said . “The Democratic Party must take the initiative with firm determination.”

Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Seong-hwan noted that after the prosecution, the judiciary is also a vested interest and is finally shaking up democracy.

Congressman Kim insisted on his Facebook page: “Before the launch of the airlift (criminal investigation office of senior officials), he was involved in strong resistance from the prosecution … Some judges also seem very uncomfortable that his poster vested interest has been broken. ” “The excessive politicization of the judiciary and the prosecution is trying to fundamentally undermine democracy. The rulings related to Professor Kyung-Shim Chung and President Seok-yeol Yoon symbolize this,” he strongly distrusted the court’s ruling.

He said, “What should I do? Four years ago, I met in Gwanghwamun and held a candle against the Gukjeong Nongdan … Now, I have to listen to the candlelight online against the huge copyright sign. What the The government or the National Assembly should do more quickly. It is the Christmas holidays. “The clock is at zero due to heavy fog. At times like this, it’s colder, but I have to act in an emergency. “

Representative Kim Byung-ki urged President Yun to resign. Representative Kim noted, “The president who unconventionally selected prosecutor Yoon, who was working on the sidelines after drinking water, is the president.”

“As a member of the administration, as a member of the executive branch, before thanking the judiciary, you must say that you are sorry to have hurt the people and the president,” he said, saying, “If you want to maintain common sense, leave that position now.” .

Representative Kim Yong-min emphasized judicial reform with many seats ahead. Representative Kim said: “I think I am losing, but I never lose. Even if I lose the battle, I can win the war,” he emphasized, “I will make the prosecution and the court loyal to the people through legislation. I have enough time. and seats “.

Representative Kim Nam-guk questioned the court’s decision. Furthermore, he urged President Yun to apologize. He noted: “The decision to cite the stay of execution by judging that the wording of the documents for the judge’s inspection was highly inappropriate and dangerous is as absurd as the last decision that allowed Jeon Kwang-hoon to meet in Gwanghwamun, concerned about the spread of infectious diseases “.

“Since there was a court ruling that the wording of the inspection document was inappropriate, President Yoon should sincerely apologize to the public,” he said. “The purpose of the wording and whether the document is used should be thoroughly investigated through an investigation.”

On the 25th, announcer Kim Eo-jun said, “It’s impossible to have a trial,” on his TBS radio show “Kim Eo-jun’s News Factory.” “A judge in the administrative court said:” I will guarantee my position as attorney general. “Noted. So (court) it seems that it does not matter that the content of the decision is not correct.”

He said: “There are reactions and reactions in the world, so if (the court) comes out like this, there will be a greater reaction of force,” he said. “Because it’s Christmas, focus to this point and focus again on Monday.”

Amid the voices of reform in the judiciary focused on the ruling party, the acting vice-president judge criticized that “the ‘reform’ is read as fear.”

On the 25th, Busan District Court Chief Judge Kim Tae-gyu (53rd, 28th Judicial Research and Training Institute) posted on his Facebook page that read: “If the prosecutor does not listen, reform the prosecution , if the judge does not listen, the reform is read with fear “. Indicated.

Deputy Judge Kim said the day before (24): “If the judge vaguely says that the judge is biased and threatens the person, it is nothing more than an obligation to ‘just make the judgment I want.’ If so, just send a political instructor to court and decide the conclusions beforehand, and if you don’t follow them, you can challenge them. The impeachment also requires only 151 seats, so it’s not difficult. “

At the same time, he criticized that “you only have to pay the cost of turning the country into obscenity.” Furthermore, he noted in the passport, “I don’t know if the court felt biased, even though many of them were arrested and severely punished due to redemption and judicial turmoil.”

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party appreciated President Moon Jae-in’s apology. In a briefing on the 25th, Democratic Party spokesman Kang Seon-woo said in a briefing on the 25th that he was “expressing a responsible position as the person in charge of human resources” and “expressing a willingness to complete the reform of the prosecution service “. Then he emphasized: “We will continue our efforts to prevent problems such as insufficient inspections by judges, which are clearly revealed by the court ruling.”

Earlier, Blue House spokesman Kang Min-seok said in a written briefing that afternoon that President Moon said: “Given the court’s ruling, I hope the indictment is an opportunity to reflect on the exercise of fair and moderate prosecution rights. ” I hope there are no more controversies about that, ”he said. In addition, he said, “The Ministry of Justice and prosecutors will have to carry out follow-up measures such as the reform of the prosecution and the reform of the right to investigate through stable cooperation.”

Reporter Han Seung-gon [email protected]