[ad_1]
 ▲ The Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, is present at the plenary session of the National Assembly on the 9th and takes a book out of his bag. |
|
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
“I’m still trying to wrap my family in unusual rhetorical conclusions …”
This is part of an article published by the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae, on his Facebook page on the 9th. The day before, Minister Chu harshly criticized the prosecution for delivering only one of the three prosecutors to trial. who received alcohol from former Star Mobility president Kim Bong-hyun.
On the 8th, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office announced the results of an investigation into the suspected receipt of alcohol. On July 18, 2019, from 9:30 p.m. to 1 a.m. the next day, at an entertainment bar in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, former President Kim revealed that he had served alcohol to three lawyers and three prosecutors. Former President Kim’s claim revealed to be true (related article: Kim Bong-hyun revealed as fact … “5.36 million won entertainment to prosecutors until 1 am” http: // omn. kr / 1qw78).
However, the prosecution divided the alcohol price of 5.36 million won into five participants, and only one prosecutor, excluding two prosecutors who returned home before 11 p.m., received entertainment worth more than 1 million won. Law of law) was handed over to trial for rape. Former President Kim insisted that it should be subtracted when calculating whether alcoholic beverages exceeded one million won for entertainment, which is a standard violation of the Kim Young-ran Act, but the prosecution did not accept it.
Minister Chu said on his Facebook page on the 9th: “Public sentiment has a common sense question,” Does this make sense? “No one answers the question.”
“Was Kim Bong-hyun comfortable eating, drinking, and having fun with the prosecutors at the meeting place? And would it be natural to calculate the price of alcohol for that day by dividing it among the prosecutors, including Kim Bong-hyun? You can’t. “
Minister Chu said: “If the prosecutors themselves renounce the rule of law without discrimination and even reject democratic control, who can exercise democratic control over the prosecution? I think the prosecution is showing the public that the airlift is the answer. “I emphasized.
The following is the full text of an article by Minister Chu Mi-ae on Facebook.
Religious people like Catholicism, Protestantism, Buddhism and Buddhism won to their feet like wildfires and yelled at the prosecution for reforms.
I remember the sublime of religious people who always took the initiative to revive democracy and protect homes in an era of violence and dictatorship. Once again, I express my deepest respect for the solemn declaration of the state of religious people who mourn fairness and justice that are now crumbling, and I urge their self-reliance so that the prosecution may restore themselves as the true protector of Justice.
However, the prosecution seems to believe that it is not yet the time to respond.
It is because they are still trying to wrap their family with shaky research findings.
A definition that is not based on common sense is not.
The opposite of common sense is just sophistry.
Public sentiment has a common sense question: “Does this make sense?” However, no one answers this question.
Let me ask you a question that I may have as common sense right now. It was based on what has been reported in the media, and since it is raising opinions that anyone who has seen the media may have, I hope that the intervention of the minister is not considered.
1. The president’s keen interest in the Lime case appears in the transcript Han Dong-hoon posted last summer. As in the transcript of the conversation between Dong-Hoon Han and Dong-jae Lee in March, the president met with Sam-Hyeon Song, head of the Southern District Prosecutor’s Office, to express his special interest and encouragement in the Lime investigation. . This has already been reported by many media.
2. And in Kim Bong-hyun’s handwritten letter published in October, the president’s special interest in the Lime incident reappears.
3. In light of Han Dong-hoon’s transcripts and media reports on the president’s interest in the Lime incident, it can be seen that Kim Bong-hyun’s statement on hospitality for the holiday party The prosecutor’s drink is in more than suspicious context.
4. The president, who has a special interest in rhyme, and Lee Ju-hyung, a lawyer, showed their strong friendship with the president. In the midst of this, Kim Bong-hyun is introduced to special prosecutors brought in by this lawyer. Would Kim Bong-hyun enjoy eating, drinking, and having fun with the prosecutors at the meeting place? And is it natural to calculate the price of alcohol for that day by dividing it with the prosecutors, including Kim Bong-hyun? We cannot avoid asking reasonable questions that anyone may have.
If the prosecutors themselves renounce the rule of law without discrimination and even reject democratic control, who can take democratic control over the prosecution? I think the prosecutors themselves are showing the public that the air defense agency has no choice but to be the answer. It has been a year since the airborne law was established. The launch time has been more than five months. In the midst of this, there are still political forces blocking the exit.
But I have hope. Even if it’s late, it’s just this kind of “preventing non-common sense things from happening.” That you are heading in that direction. It is because only that can have a dream of a bright and fair world.
Once again, I would like to express my deep respect and gratitude to the religious people who led the way for prosecution reform. Thank you
