Who is the real “loser” in the US presidential election, not Trump or the 70 million people who voted for Trump? | Pakkun (Patrick Harlan) | Column



[ad_1]

What is the real

The long lines at the polling stations in each state are also influenced by the measures of the Republican Party (Houston, Texas) AP / AFLO

Electoral fraud! Stop the count! (Stop the bill!) I’ll sue you! This is not the first time I have heard such an angry voice in the presidential election. The scene on the news now is similar to the 2000 confrontation between Democratic candidate Al Gore and Republican candidate George W. Bush.
20201117issue_cover200.jpg
Suddenly here is a quiz. At that time, more than 100 million people voted across the country, but how many votes did the president decide?

I think the correct answer is “5 people”.

Let me explain. The 2000 elections in Florida were fraught with problems. Bush had the advantage with a difference of 1,784 votes at the end of the vote count, but because of the small difference, the count began. Also, it was discovered that there were a large number of invalid votes due to machine problems. As I manually review the votes one by one, Gore delves into Bush’s leadership. At that time! … A “demo team” dressed in strangely expensive clothes crashed into the largest office in the county! He yelled Election Fraud! Electoral fraud! (Election fraud! Election fraud!) And he demanded that the counting process be stopped.

The identity of the protesters is not a citizen who stood up voluntarily, but a professional activist who was hired by the Republican Party and flew in from Washington. In other words, it was false. He was ridiculed as “Brooks Brothers Rebellion” for his clothes and was quick to say “You’re a scam,” but the operation was successful and the count was stopped.

And the Florida secretary of state, who has jurisdiction over the elections, approved the “Bush victory” and the intermediate result as the final result. Interestingly, the Secretary of State was also the Florida president of the Bush campaign team. Yes, members of the Bush team are the arbiters in the Gore-Bush showdown! It is a skewed mechanism that is not allowed even in grass baseball.

Gore, of course, filed a lawsuit requesting the recount be resumed. The Bush camp responds to a legal battle. Gore loses in the first instance, appeals and wins. And finally, he lost again in the Federal Supreme Court. At that point, the Supreme Court Justice broke 5 to 4. So the “five” of the justices who stopped counting and gave birth to President Bush … I think that’s the correct answer! (Maybe I forgot, this is a quiz).

Target urban areas and colored races.

The Republican Party appears to have woken up to an operation since the Bush vs. Gore. It appears that the votes of Democratic Party supporters, who are concentrated in urban areas, were counted somewhat less because the mechanical problems in the example occurred primarily at polling stations in urban areas of Florida. Later, I fantasize about petting a white cat in a secret base under the volcano, saying, “Oh, that’s a coincidence, but it would be to our advantage if we could artificially reproduce the same thing!”

Next pageThe strongest ally to suppress the vote



[ad_2]