“Persons to be removed (from the Deputy Secretary)”, Mr. Sugita communicated the candidates for exclusion from the academic conference and was specified in the official documents: Tokyo Shimbun TOKYO Web



[ad_1]

On the 11th, there is an official document showing that the Under Secretary of State Kazuhiro Sugita has informed the Cabinet Office, which has jurisdiction over the academic conference, of the candidates who should be excluded at the time of appointment due to the question of the refusal to appoint new members of the Japanese academic conference. It was revealed. The official Cabinet Office document presented by the government to the directors of the Budget Committee of the House of Representatives clearly states that “the person to be removed (from the undersecretary).” Mr. Sugita’s participation has already been recognized by Prime Minister Yoshii Suga, but was also supported by official documents.

Words

The words “Person to be removed (of the undersecretary)” written in the blackened part

The government presented a series of official documents created in the process prior to the prime minister’s decision. It was requested by Interim Representative Renji of the Constitutional Democratic Party. One of the documents with more than 100 pages was handwritten “Person to be removed (from Deputy Secretary) R2.9.24”, and the lower part was painted black.

The government admitted that the document was prepared by the Cabinet Office and that the “undersecretary” was Mr. Sugita at the meeting of the directors of the Budget Committee of the House of Representatives. The part painted in black did not clarify the specific content as “things related to personnel matters”. Opposition parties believe the names and titles of the six people who were denied appointment are listed.

September 24 of this year, which is in the document, is the day the Cabinet Office drafted a decision document to appoint 99 of the 105 new candidates for membership recommended by the academic council, excluding 6 candidates.

The opposition party requested a closing review by the Budget Commission and Mr. Sugita’s invitation, stating that it was necessary to inform the parties of the reasons and circumstances for denying the appointment. The ruling party will not respond. (Daisuke Yokoyama)


[ad_2]