“Pay 9.5 million yen to ex-comfort women” Abnormality of President Tora Bun, who respects distorted judgment Worst postwar relations between Japan and South Korea worsen

Judgment that argues for problems that have been resolved in Japan and South Korea

Twelve former comfort women were sentenced to a lawsuit against the Japanese government for compensation of 100 million won (about 9.5 million yen) per person on January 8 in the Seoul Central District Court in South Korea. The district court ordered the Japanese government to pay 100 million won per person, as the plaintiff appealed.

Photo = EPA / Jiji Press Photo

A statue of a girl symbolizing the comfort woman problem installed near the Japanese embassy in Seoul = January 8, 2021

This is the first time that a former comfort woman has been convicted in a lawsuit against the Japanese government. South Korean President Moon Jae-in has expressed respect for this unreasonable and distorted ruling. It is the same as the demand for hiring. Do you intend to worsen the worst relationship between Japan and South Korea after the war? How ignorant of Japan-Korea relations are you? The open mouth is not blocked.

South Korea must cooperate with Japan and the United States to crush the North Korean regime that does not stop nuclear and missile development, and to counter China, which is increasing its military power. Tora Wen, who is following the ruling that has already solved the problem of comfort women and the recruitment of workers in Japan and South Korea, should step down as president.

Distorted judgment that the Japanese government is subject to Korean jurisdiction

“We cannot accept the decision in any way,” Prime Minister Yoshii Suga told reporters at the prime minister’s residence on the 8th. Naturally.

Here, I would like to explain how the comfort woman’s judgment is distorted. The ruling noted that “the comfort women system is a systematic and systematic criminal anti-humanitarian act by the Japanese government, and the sovereignty exemption cannot be applied.” “The Japanese government is subject to the jurisdiction of South Korea.” I added the judgment. These points and judgments are international madness and are highly distorted.

“The plaintiff suffered unimaginable mental and physical anguish,” the judgment ordering full compensation must be denied.

Indeed, the exemption from sovereignty refers to the principle of international law that sovereign nations and their property are not subject to foreign jurisdiction from the point of view of being equal to each other. It is the origin of international customary law that maintains fluid relations between nations. The Korean judiciary’s decision that the Japanese government is subject to Korean jurisdiction is a problem in that regard.