[ad_1]
The 13-inch model of the MacBook Pro is equipped with the 16-inch model of the MacBook Pro, the MacBook Air, and then the Magic Keyboard. With this, all Apple laptops have been converted to Magic Keyboard that uses the scissor frame.
However, there are some points that are a little difficult to understand in this announcement. The evaluation on the real machine is yet to come, but first of all, I would like to organize the information and delve a little into the attention of the maniac.
“Two different products” mixed
The feature of this time is that the motherboard equipped with 2 ThunderBolt 3 ports in the price range that is easy to buy and the 4-port model of ThundeBolt 3, which is the highest model, are completely different from each other. Similarly, although it is a “13-inch MacBook Pro model”, the 2-port model is the same as the motherboard of the previous generation model, but with the keyboard replaced by a magic keyboard. The performance will probably be exactly the same.
On the other hand, the top model is the latest Ice Lake architecture, which has improved performance in every aspect. Although the details will be described later, it is a processor with a model number that did not exist in Intel’s product database at the time of the announcement, and is considered a special specification for Apple. Memory bandwidth has been expanded by adopting Ice Lake, and memory power consumption has been reduced (by adopting LPDD R4X), doubling the standard 16GB to double the amount. Also, it is possible to increase the size to 32GB per option. As with the 16-inch model, the maximum capacity of the SSD has been increased to 4TB, which is double the conventional size.
The latter is a legitimate successor model, the former is an offer model with an updated keyboard, and it also competes with the MacBook Air in terms of price range. However, the screen has a wider color gamut and a higher brightness on the MacBook Pro. Also, the performance of the single core CPU is the same, but when it becomes multi-core, the MacBook Pro becomes faster. . The first difference is the weight and performance of the GPU. Based on the GeekBench 5 score, the MacBook Air is 40% faster.
In other words, if you want a lighter weight as much as possible, you want a gold model, or you want to emphasize the performance of the GPU, MacBook Air, if you want better cooling performance with higher CPU quality and display quality, MacBook Pro low price Will it be a model etc.?
The high-end model adopts an unprecedented processor
The Magic Keyboard offers a 0.7mm thickness increase and a slight weight gain (30g for this model), but most of the trade-offs are for its nice touch (and possibly fewer glitches). Users will appreciate this change.
There are two possibilities for the 10th Gen Intel Core mobile processor that can be installed on 13-inch MacBook Pro, Comet Lake-U and Ice Lake-U, but the choice was Ice Lake- It was U. Ice Lake has themes like support for Machine learning instruction sets and support for WiFi 6, but unfortunately it doesn’t support WiFi 6 like MacBook Air.
However, compared to Coffee Lake, which has been adopted by the 13-inch MacBook Pro, the GPU’s performance has been overwhelmingly improved. According to Apple’s claim, it will be up to 80% faster, but I would like to evaluate it with the real device. What I’d like to point out here is that it appears to be the first appearance among the many Ice Lakes.
The processor used in the 13-inch model of the new MacBook Pro is not listed in Intel’s product database at the time of writing. It will be released soon as it was the same for the MacBook Air, but the 1035 G7 model, which is closest to the Core i5 used by the standard model, has a base operating frequency of 1.5 GHz, even when used in a 25 watt configuration. It is well below the 2GHz number of the MacBook Pro.
When it comes to the Core i7 model, which is the fastest option that can be ordered with CTO, the base clock frequency is 2.3 GHz, which is also not included in the database at the moment. However, this is supposed to be the same as the Core i7-1068G7 whose specs have already been clarified, and the model number Core i7-1068NG7 is also leaking.
The Core i5 model is probably the model number of 1038G7.
Meaning of adopting a new CPU model number
Ice Lake-U, announced at Computex in 2019, is a SoC that integrates four Sunnycove cores. All models support Hyper-Threading, which means that up to 8 threads can run at the same time.
Intel claims that the Sunnycove core achieves 18% more instruction per clock (IPC) than all generations, so it actually has a lower numerical operating frequency than Coffee Lake, but there really isn’t much difference in its power. processing. As previously mentioned, Ice Lake, which was previously listed in the Intel database, only had a maximum TDP variance of 25 watts.
However, the i7-1068G7 is said to be the Ice Lake-U chip with a power of 28 watts TDP. The Core i5 model is also a high performance version tuned by the same TDP. Ice Lake was unable to suppress heat generation and could not easily improve its performance. For this reason, GPU performance is low and generations like memory controllers are old, but CPU performance can be further mined and there is a variation of up to 6 Comet Lake cores with the option to install a External GPU and CPU performance a little patience Ice Lake It was a choice to adopt or not.
It is speculated that the reason why there is no PC with this model number other than Apple is that there were many manufacturers who decided that it would be better to have an external GPU.
But this may have Apple’s long-term strategy.
This is because Intel has both CPU and GPU after Ice Lake, and Tiger Lake, which is said to be vastly improved on GPU, is waiting. If we take the example so far, there is no denying that this release can make Intel fight again and delay the stick-tapping, but it is better to choose a built-in GPU-based design than to easily adopt an external GPU now. You may have thought you were wise.
If you really need it, add processing performance with an eGPU that connects to ThunderBolt 3 instead of installing an external GPU that saves half the power. This is because there is also an idea that the main body of the Mac should emphasize portability.
Is Apple’s decision correct? First of all, I would like you to wait for the performance evaluation with the real machine.
[ad_2]
