Kenichiro Mogi (58), a brain scientist, said that the student who took the “nose mask” was disqualified in the university entrance test, and once again, “The examiner was careful several times and when he was ineffective. I should have taken steps like writing the exam number and asking about the situation later. “

Starting on the 18th, Mr. Mogi tweeted: “It is a bad decision to produce serious results, such as invalid test results. It seems to me that it is a human rights violation on the part of the robot test director of the rule of thumb. the spoon”. It is essential to face and include individuality. There are also individualities that cannot be gently obeyed if warned. Also, although the target is a mask whose physical perception differs depending on the person. Obviously, the examiner’s answer I was childish though. I was able to hear about the situation after recording it. This is a mask door, “criticized the examiner’s response.

After that, the examinee was reported to be 40 years old, but said: “There is no change in the essential problem of lack of understanding and response to the diversity of human cognitive behaviors.” I think there are people of all ages who feel cornered and take an atypical behavior when warned to bend repeatedly, the examining side was careful several times and it was not effective. At that point, I think I should have taken steps like writing down the exam number and asking about the situation later, “he said.

Subsequently, he updated his YouTube channel after receiving a report from the Police Agency that he had been detained by the Police Agency on suspicion of not leaving the building because he had been locked in the bathroom of the place for approximately 3 hours after being disqualified. . Regarding the informed behavior of the examinee, he criticized that “it should not be preferable in the place of the common examination” and said: “If the university entrance examination center is operational, it is one of the many examinees. If it was an operation who prioritized taking the exam in a way that allows us to focus on ourselves, we should have understood that when there were such atypical exams, the answer like this was not enough. ” And said.

Continuing, “When an outlier comes along, it’s natural for the college entrance examination center side to assume that it may not be possible to say ‘Please follow the regulations because that’s the way it is’ in the usual sense. I think it should. be done, “he said. “Some children find it painful to sit quietly at the test site in the first place. No matter how old they are, there will still be children who react atypically under the physical pressure of the masks.” “In that case, there are cases where we can’t deal with it just by applying the rules and saying, ‘How many times did you pay attention?’ We need to share an understanding of that.”

Also, on the fact that a number of comments were received on the Internet, “because individuality is important, the rules can be broken”, “I have not said a word. No one says that personal freedom takes precedence over public welfare” . I haven’t said. “He said the informed actions taken by the examinee were” I think it was a nuisance, “and he constantly thought about” how to deal with the outlier that causes such an extreme reaction. “He explained that he says.