[ad_1]
Note
Raw data of the patients who were the first infected with the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) by the Chinese authorities to a research team from the World Health Organization (WHO) that visited Wuhan to find out the origin of the new coronavirus . He refused to provide.
China Refused to Provide WHO Team with Raw Data on Early COVID Cases, Team Member Says | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-who-china/china-refused-to-provide-who-team-with-raw-data-on-early-covid-cases-team- member-says-idUSKBN2AD090
White House Cites “Deep Concerns” Over WHO COVID Report, Demands Initial Data From China | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa/white-house-cites-deep-concerns-about-who-covid-report-demands-early-data-from-china-idINKBN2AD0FX
China refused to provide key data to the WHO team investigating the origin of the pandemic | Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/02/china-refused-to-hand-over-key-data-to-who-team-probing-pandemics-origin/
According to members of the study team, the study team requested raw data on 174 confirmed cases in December 2019 when the infection began to spread in Wuhan, but the Chinese authorities refused and the issue was raised. He said that he only provided the results of the analysis regarding the cases.
The raw data that China refuses to provide is called a “line list,” which is what the doctor asked each patient, how the patient responded, and what the doctor responded. Include details such as how it was analyzed.OutbreakProviding this list of lines is standard practice during investigations.
About half of the first 174 casesWuhan seafood wholesale market in southern China, the source of infection with the novel coronavirusAlthough it was confirmed in, the other half was confirmed outside the same market. “The non-market data in question is what we are looking for. I don’t understand why the Chinese authorities refused to release it. For political reasons, on time,” Dominic Dwire of the study team said. Is the reason? the difficulty, or some other reason … is speculation anyway. “
Furthermore, the background of the investigation itself is once again considered a problem. The study team entered China in January 2021 with a study period of four weeks, but was forced to stay in the hotel for the first two weeks as a quarantine measure. Even after the investigation began, only the facilities approved by the Chinese authorities were allowed to visit.
In this regard, Dwire said: “Although the problem of not providing raw data will be mentioned in the final report, it is a fact that the Chinese side provided much more data than the previous year, which is an improvement in itself.” .
Regarding this process, US national security adviser Sullivan said: “The WHO report should be an independent investigation without interference or alteration from the Chinese government. Deepening understanding of the novel corona virus pandemic. China it must provide early epidemic data to prepare for the next crisis, “he said, expressing deep concern about this WHO survey. In response, the Chinese embassy said: “In recent years, the United States has refused multilateral cooperation and caused damage to the WHO, and China and other countries that supported the WHO in the global COVID-19 epidemic. they should be blamed by name. no, “he strongly repelled.
Copy the title and URL of this article.
[ad_2]
