[ad_1]
Shinobu Sakagami (53) has reached his sixth year as an overall MC for “Viking.” As a talk show, he has a strong presence on how to change the talk.
“After that broadcast, all the business partners all called us at the same time. Only the accusations that we were “intentionally hiding construction defects” were unilaterally transmitted … Thanks to that. , The work that had been going on for eight years has also been interrupted. “
Tetsuya Yoshida, President of Daiko Co., Ltd., talks about his sad feelings. “That broadcast” is “Viking MORE” (Fuji TV series) on November 10th. On that day, “Viking” addressed the subject of “roadblocking work”, which was first reported by “Weekly Bunharu” (November 5 issue).
[Artículo relacionado: “Viking” Nihondai Ameft está obsesionado con las críticas porque “ya no es un ataque individual”]
According to the “Weekly Bunharu” report, Fumito Yoshioka, president of “Yoshioka Architectural Design Co., Ltd.” which was an earthquake-resistant secondary construction contractor, said “Necessary” for “Midoribashi” about Chuo-do in the Hino city, Tokyo. It was a construction that lacked eight reinforcing bars. “
In addition, it was revealed that the prime contractor’s field staff instructed “if there are leftover reinforcements, clean up quickly” and “conceal” (prime contractor denied concealment instruction).
In “Viking”, based on an interview with President Yoshioka, the current situation was presented where there are disagreements among contractors regarding the poor construction of Midoribashi. Suddenly, Daiko, whose company name was not reported in the “Bunharu” article, was reported under his real name as prime contractor.
“Actually, it is the responsibility of our company, which is in charge of the technology, that there is no rebar in the Midoribashi abutment. We apologize for causing concern to many people,” Yoshida said. )
However, in the broadcast, “too many one-sided claims were reported,” Yoshida laments.
“Yoshioka’s side insisted that the artisans we sent had cut corners, saying, ‘By the time we went to the site, there were no rebar.’ That is a fundamental difference in the first place. I will.
Although I explained this point to the “Viking” staff in detail, the company name was reported without properly addressing the “what is different and how” part in the claim on our side and on Yoshioka’s side. Was. “
The details of the construction of Midoribashi, which President Yoshida talks about, are as follows. Daiko, who had been entrusted with managing the site by the main contractor, entrusted Yoshioka Architectural Design with the safety of the workers and the actual work. There are two site managers in Midoribashi, one of which was hosted by Daiko. The other was Yoshioka Architects, who asked Daiko to take care of him and appointed him manager.
The day (December 26, 2019) the troublesome “clipping work” was carried out, when the reinforced construction craftsman organized by Daiko, “another site manager brought in from Yoshioka’s side,” arrived at the site, “Please stop work and come home” “We will do construction at our company (Yoshioka)”.
In other words, President Yoshida said, “The ‘trimming job’ with eight missing rebar was done at the site where there were only site managers and workers organized by Yoshioka Architectural Design.” The side is accusing without admitting construction defects in their own work ”.
“There is also a ‘report mail’ from the craftsman who returned from Yoshioka’s side that day. As Yoshioka’s side told us, we were completely mismanaged about the return of the site. I also told him about this, but the comments were not used. absolutely “.
[ad_2]
