[ad_1]
With facebookThe Twitter CEO testified in the Senate Judiciary Committee on the 17th, answering tough questions from lawmakers. There is still a gap between the Democratic and Republican parties on how to regulate the two companies before the new parliament, which will start in January 2021.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey were asked for four hours about managing content and engaging in political comment. Republicans have repeatedly claimed that the two companies are conservative, while Democrats have reiterated concerns about the spread of false information and hate speech on the platform.
Both parties want to amend section 230 of the US Communications Quality Act, which protects both companies from lawsuits over the management of user-submitted content, but their goals are fundamentally different. The Republican Party wants more content intact, but the Democratic Party wants more removal. On the other hand, both are concerned about the negative impact on freedom of expression.
“Article 230 needs to be reviewed,” said Gram, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, close to President Trump. In response to these views, both CEOs said there was a need to increase transparency about the types of posts to remove. Zuckerberg noted that if regulations change, companies will need to meet certain criteria for content removal. The company has already detailed in its quarterly report, including the types of posts to remove.
Gram supported the idea of greater transparency, but intends to promote legislation that limits the ability of both companies to manage political content. He also questioned the decisions of the two companies to limit the circulation of recent New York Post articles that could cause political harm to the next Byden president: “You’re like the final editor. I think so.”
Meanwhile, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Finestein Democratic Party, suggested that the two companies should have taken deeper steps, such as eliminating President Trump’s false statements, such as winning the presidential election.
In response, CEO Dorsey agreed with the “idea,” but explained that providing more background on misleading information about the election was key to Twitter’s policy.
Original title:
Zuckerberg and Dorsey face angry lawmakers who are still divided over their concerns (抜 粋)