[ad_1]
Huge screen showing Abe’s resignation conference and indifferent people (August 28, Tokyo) Kim Kyung-Hoon-REUTERS
The seven years and eight months of the Abe administration are “desperation and frustration” for conservatives at least. In 2012, in the election of the governor of the Liberal Democratic Party under the administration of the Noda Democratic Party, new President Abe, who defeated Shigeru Ishiba and became president, appointed “Senkaku Islands resident public officials” and “sponsored by the Japanese ceremony of the Takeshima government. ” Actually, this was specified in the PLD’s policy compilation in the lower house elections of the same year.
In 2012, I was a 29-year-old right-winger. Almost all right-wing and conservatives, including myself, yearn for these two promises that the Democratic government and successive PLD administrations failed to deliver. However, the Takeshima government-sponsored ceremony was withdrawn immediately after the start of Abe’s second administration, leaving the Senkaku Islands’ public officials no longer available, and in 2017, Prime Minister Abe himself said: “ Currently Officially Completely Retired “.
We Conservatives, who expected the birth of a full-fledged radical conservative government from the short life of Abe’s first administration in about a year, were dissatisfied with these withdrawal measures and neglected the measures taken at the beginning of the administration. had. However, the majority of respondents said, “First of all, it should be fine if the administration of the PLD is born,” and complaints about the withdrawal of the pledge were sealed.
Conservatives then hoped that Prime Minister Abe, who had an aggressive sense of values, would withdraw or revise the Kono-Murayama speech. For conservatives, Kono’s speech, which acknowledged the Japanese army’s involvement in the issue of comfort women, was unacceptable, and Murayama’s speech, which deeply regrets Japan’s aggressive side in the previous World War, also appeared as a desperate goal. ..
Conservatives seeking revision of Abe’s story
But I saw such conservative mysterious flames with awake eyes. According to the empirical story of Ikuhiko Hata and others, it is doubtful that the Japanese armed forces “throw women and girls on the truck”, but the presence of comfort women is a fact, and Japan is likely to reflect on it after the war. Furthermore, it was a fact that in the previous World War, Japan called for military operations to take control of the Asian resource zone, and it was not reasonable to deny the invading side. ..
In fact, the Abe Cabinet verified the Kono speech, but did not withdraw the Kono speech, did not verify the Murayama speech, and followed the Kono-Murayama speech in the post-war 70-year speech in 2015, announced an admission. dissident of Japan’s wrong national policy against the previous war. I thought, “Shinzo Abe is said to be a historical revisionist, but when it comes to speech, he is reflecting on the war and has revised it quite a bit.” However, the conservative center seemed quite unhappy with Abe’s speech 70 years after the war, which followed Kono and Murayama’s speech.
[ad_2]
