Nomura CEO Faces Possible Alkegos-Related Loss Just Before Inauguration-Bloomberg



[ad_1]

Pedestrians cross a street in front of the Urbannet Otemachi building, which houses the headquarters of Nomura Holdings Inc., in Tokyo, Japan, on Monday, March 29, 2021. Nomura's warning of a

Photographer: Kiyoshi Ota / Bloomberg

The CEO (CEO) of Nomura Holdings (HD) Kentaro Okuda Group has performed well in the first year since taking office. Family Office in the United States,Until the problems surrounding Arquegos Capital Management were discovered.

On the 29th, a few days before the first anniversary of CEO Okuda’s inauguration (57), Nomura HD could suffer damages of $ 2 billion (about 220 billion yen) due to transactions with customers in a subsidiary of USAPublished. The business partner is Arquegos, according to people familiar with the matter.

Nomura Holdings press conference when CEO unexpectedly leaves office

Kentaro Okuda, CEO of Nomura HD

Arquegos is a family office that manages and manages the property of former US hedge fund trader Tiger Management, Bill Juan. Last week, the bank was forced to sell $ 20 billion in shares it held after failing to respond to a margin call (request for additional margin).

Nomura HD’s stock price fell 16% on the 29th, the highest since its listing. The market capitalization of around 380 billion yen has been lost, threatening a tipping point that will lead to the arrival of a new era of sustainable earnings that executives have hoped for. According to a report by Jeffreys Financial Group, if this loss becomes reality, there is a risk of erasing most of Nomura HD’s pre-tax earnings in the second half of the fiscal year ending March 2021.

“I think Nomura often learns from other companies in terms of controlling loss limits,” said Hideyasu Ban, an analyst at Jeffreys Securities. “In a broad sense, I think it is inevitable that top management is responsible for this matter,” he said.

A Nomura HD executive who responded to the interview on condition of anonymity said on the 30th that the company had a long-standing relationship with Mr. Juan. It is unknown when the deal began.

 

Nomura Holdings headquarters, as loss warning is said to be linked to Archegos liquidation

Juan closed Tiger Asia Management and Tiger Asia Partners in 2012 after being sued by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for manipulating the insider trading and stocks of Chinese banks. Juan and these companies paid $ 44 million and was barred from working in the investment advisory industry as a condition of the deal.

Nomura HD executives said they were beginning to examine the possible causes of the loss. He declined to comment on how many charges he has left in relation to Arquegos.

Big winner

Nomura’s arm in the Americas has won the most outside of Japan this year

Source: Nomura


With Okuda, who became CEO in April last year, commercial and investment banking operations in Japan and abroad were strong, and consolidated net income from April to December 2008 began applying US GAAP. It had reached a record 308.5 billion yen. since the fiscal year ending March 2002.

“The unexpected loss may have ended a relatively good honeymoon for Okuda,” said Morning Star analyst Michael McDadd. Nomura HD posted a consolidated net loss for January-March 2008.However, after Mr. Okuda took office, business performance turned into excellent performance. The driving force this time was troubled American business.

Nomura HD says that this matter does not affect the business performance and financial strength of the company and its US subsidiary, but among analysts, it has a negative impact on the business performance and shareholder profitability of the fiscal year that ends March 31, 2009. It is inevitableThere is also a view. The company’s share price on the 30th fell 0.7% from the previous day, and the rate of increase over the past year was reduced to 25%.

No comment was obtained from a Nomura HD spokesperson.

Increased interest in risk management

Shinichi Tamura, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence (BI), said in a report on the 30th: “As the next development after the initial reaction, such as stock prices, not just the final amount of the loss and the detailed details of the transaction, but also the interest in risk management It may increase. ” “If the loss is a transaction with a specific customer, it is a one-time / transitory event, but if there is an issue with risk management, there may be concerns about the impact on similar transactions.”

Is it transitory or will the impact be extended? National authorities are also trying to determine the situation. On the 29th, FSA executives told reporters that proper post-processing of transactions was important and then they would confirm risk management.

[ad_2]