There was something with Jack Dorsey on Thursday, and it’s not just the background of his video call. While Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg and Alphabet and Google boss Sundar Pichai testified to the home congress with delicious home-office fee settings, the Twitter CEO, now a typical wild-man, appeared in his kitchen with a beard and a nose ring. It had a clock showing the prices of various cryptocurrencies (if you’re wondering what it was, which There were many).
CEO January, U.S. The first-hour hearing with the CEO after the Capitol attack is aimed at questioning how social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube, for radicalization, affect young children and spread misinformation. But from the beginning, members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee tried to reconcile their witnesses with yes-or-no questions. Surprisingly, the CEO tried not to comply, often trying to explain why an issue became so complicated that a representative stopped asking him, again, “Yes or no?” This pattern repeats itself over and over again.
Although Dorsey was Initially valid To be Only the CEO. To answer “yes” to a question about the role of social media in the attack on the Capitol – he said there is little responsibility on Twitter – there are many questions that he did not answer directly. Notably, while the Democratic Rep. Of Illinois. Bobby Rush responded to Dorsey on whether the civil rights audit via Twitter had been completed – yes or no – Dorsey said instead, “We have chosen a different approach.”
The delegates quickly became frustrated. “Let me say this, and I think it irritates us all. And that is, no one knows the word ‘yes’ or ‘yes’. ”Democratic Rip of California. Anna Ashu said. Republican Rep. Billy Long Miss F. Missouri also asked, “Do you know the difference between these two words ‘yes’ and ‘no’?” “Yes, I know the difference,” Darcy said. And then the CEO went on Twitter. The tweet had a question mark and poll: yes or no?
Then, as she faced the hearing-online hearing room, Dorsey began choosing tweets both relative and random: a mention of her crypto clock, a picture of the San Francisco intersection, and praise for her ability to tweet while testifying. Earlier in the hearing, Dorsey used his developed commentary to discuss Twitter’s idea for a “decentralized open source protocol” that would purposefully address some of the existing problems with social media. When a Twitter user pointed out that it would be “wonderful” if members of Congress asked him about this, Dorsey Tweeted, “Agreed.”
In the full climax of Dorsey’s rash tweet, New York’s Democratic Rep. Kathleen Rice provoked him to post while he was on the digital stand. “Mr. Dorsey, what’s your ‘yes’ or ‘no’ winning on your Twitter account poll?” Rice asked, raising her eyebrows before asking. “Yes,” Dorsey replied nicely. Is Quite Impressive, ”Rice finished. During the hearing, Dorsey continued to select and respond to tweets, which lasted about six hours. Was Dorsey getting most of his attention? Yes.
Future Tension is a partnership between Slate, New America and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy and society.
