[ad_1]
ROME, ITALY – MARCH 02: A general view during the Serie A match between SS Lazio and Torino FC at Stadio Olimpico on March 02, 2021 in Rome, Italy. The match, although it has not been postponed by Lega Serie A, will not be played as the Torino team must observe a quarantine at home until midnight on Tuesday due to Covd-19. (Photo by Marco Rosi – SS Lazio / Getty Images)
As Torino prepares to take the field in Crotone, it is a weekend of waiting on the other major open question in the grenade, and that is the story related to the failure of Lazio-Torino. The Granada club has filed a complaint and is now waiting for the Sports Judge, who has frozen all decisions about the match in recent days, to communicate the date on which he will issue his decision. It is inevitable that the issue will continue to be at the center of public opinion and the press. In this sense, yesterday a version of events appeared in a Roman newspaper according to which there are gray areas in the work of ASL Torino 1. In particular, the Turin health authority, on March 1, would have “extended” the deadline for the Torino activity block, making it run from February 24 and not February 23 (the day the grenade club announced the stop of training) so the seven days also covered the date of March 2, in which Lazio-Turin should have been played.
ALSO READ: Nicola pre Crotone-Turin: “Covid? It is not the problem that matters, but how you react “
THE DISMISSAL – Lawyer Eduardo Chiacchio, the lawyer who defends Torino’s interests in this matter, denies this version of events, however: “It is a wrong reconstruction,” the lawyer explained to Toro News, questioned on this point. I cannot publicly release the details of the documents out of respect for the ongoing procedure and professional ethics; I will limit myself to saying that what is written does not correspond to what appears in the documentary materials that we have presented to the court. On Friday, after the last working day three days before the game, we filed the complaint. Now we wait for the Sports Judge to inform us when he intends to pronounce. Lazio has up to two days before the ruling to send their counter-discounts: to date they have not done so yet, but we hope they will, ”the lawyer explains. I chat. He concludes: “The big procedural difference from what happened to Napoli in the match against Juventus is that we have a counterpart to argue with, while the Juventus club was limited to assisting externally. When you speak alone in a trial without a counterpart, everything is easier ”, concludes the lawyer.
ALSO READ: Cosmi pre Crotone-Turin: “I find a coach who has done very well here”
[ad_2]
