[ad_1]
Who won? Zaia and Zingaretti, first. Because Zaia’s is not just a local victory. In Veneto he gets a plebiscite, but the fact that his personal payroll obtains triple the votes of the League makes his diary with Salvini inevitable, and when he goes to vote in less than two years only one can be the national “favorite” (with growing melons). How will Zaia make good use of this victory? With what positions at the national level can you make it clear that you have a different line from Salvini’s? And is it really different from Salvini, or is it just a matter of style? And it may be comforting to think that a civil right that so many newspapers insist on imagining could be such, rather than alien to the Republican Constitution (born of anti-fascism and imbued with the values of the Resistance), if the possible options are reduced to the frying pan, grilled and The cauldron of Meloni, Salvini and Zaia?
Without a doubt, Zingaretti won. Weeks ago the anguish of a coat or almost on the right had been repackaged, the result of the regional teams is a substantial draw, his secretariat takes no more risks. But how can you build on this success? Because if you look more closely at the three positive results, Zingaretti’s victory takes on other colors and other names. In Tuscany fear won, certainly not the horrible candidate Giani. In Campania the Democratic Party did not win, De Luca won, his personal list obscures that of the party, and especially the fifteen (!) Of civic lists, vulgar clientelists, catches one in four voters. Whatever Zingaretti’s project is, how can it be so scrawny as to seduce these voters (and drive away the truly democratic ones)? In Puglia it is less suffocating, but even here the client lists are much more favored than those of the party (better not to talk about values).
The government must reach the end of the legislature, a third of the parliamentarians know that mathematically they will not be able to be reelected, many others will not be able to do it politically, it is difficult for them to reach the masochism of early elections. Another year and a half of Conte’s government, therefore. Pd-M5S Alliance. Do what? The two parties disagree on almost everything. While the coming flood of billions requires strategic decisions, essential priorities. Health and school, of course: focus on the public (as the Constitution would like) or also munify the private sector, as was obscenely done in Lombardy, reigning Formigoni and even afterwards, but also in Zingaretti’s Lazio, or creating a true service national, with resources of money and doctors and nurses in prevention, completely neglected? And with an inevitable neo-centralization of Health, now regionally feudalized.
And the many billions of dollars in avalanches that are instead wiped out annually by tax evasion and corruption? Will we continue to do nothing, as always, because evasion is massive and corruption is too? Or will grand evasion and grand corruption, which are important pieces of the mainstream establishment, begin to be beaten with brutality, making themselves credible even among the smallest tax evaders and corrupt, convincing them that legality would also become an advantage for they?
And on civil liberty measures, such as euthanasia, with the Constitutional Court calling on parliament to operate (in accordance with the Constitution, of course, not with the hierarchies of Mother Church), how much it can haggle and how it can resist clerical demands. , trampling majorities that the surveys indicate overwhelming for the freedom of each one at his own end of life, if the health minister, who has done much less than the others, is not ashamed to appoint a bishop (a very worthy person, Monsignor Paglia, and also a friend, and yet…) at the head of a commission that has to reform old-age assistance? In short, without a policy that knows how to conquer souls (I would prefer to “get excited”, but I know that the illusions would be maximum, although sacrosanct) in a year and a half the victory of the right, which has the Republican Constitution “in great dispute”, has its rivers of probability.
I have not forgotten the referendum. He did win massively. He won despite the fact that all the parties, which had also approved the reduction of seats in parliament, week after week did nothing more than filter the reasons for “no”, on the right with Berlusconi and Meloni explicitly, and with a piece League through Giorgetti, on the non-right with many exponents of the Democratic Party. And then with almost all newspapers and media.
Obviously Di Maio will try to pass this yes as his victory. Hilarious way to hide that in the meantime the M5S is in the process of dying out, and when it comes to voting you’ll have to smile if it doesn’t drop to the single-digit percentage.
Conte now has the chance of a lifetime, even a year and a half. It is useless to repeat that only an energetic, bold and visible policy of “justice and freedom” can prevent the return of law. That’s right, but I’m afraid you can’t understand it because you can’t want it, it’s not your political values. Meanwhile, it seems that for us citizens there is little or nothing to do, it does not seem like the air of civil society movements, not even of opinion movements. Let’s try at least, each one in his little one, in his niche, molecularly, to act “as if”, to continue uncompromisingly to reaffirm “justice-and-freedom”, counting on the fact that many others, scattered, scattered, disorganized, they are doing the same. Maybe something will crystallize sooner or later.
[ad_2]
