[ad_1]
“What’s the news?”, “They expelled Palamara from the single union, as it is called, the Magistrates’ Association”, “No, just imagine, you know, the expulsion is on June 20”, “But he had. appeal »,« Precisely: yesterday they rejected it »;” Who rejected it? “;” The assembly of the Magistrates Association “,” Ah, you will understand “,” Perhaps the news is that for its disciplinary process, that of CSM, had requested the summons of 133 witnesses but they only accepted 6 “, But no, that is also in the newspapers the day before yesterday», «So what is the news?». The news is that the news, by dint of diluting it and Break it up with continuous updates, you get lost and bored: the famous “big picture” goes to ramengo.
The real news, therefore, is from yesterday, tomorrow, because it is from this moment in Italian history: it has no expiration date. It is this: the judiciary is an overwhelming power that is accountable to no one and will not do so even this time; the news (yesterday) is that a single and indefensible magistrate was killed in order not to further explode the scandal of the Italian judicial power; They did it outside the Magistrates Association (the only union, as in dictatorships) of which Palamara himself was the youngest president from 2008 to 2012 (at age 39) and they also killed him despite not having been tried yet. : neither under the grotesque disciplinary profile (to the CSM) nor to the trial where he is investigated for corruption (in Perugia) and in which he is not even charged: they have only asked for an accusation. The news is that the mafia corporatism of the Italian judiciary (we repeat: mafia, as a method, as omertà) is more powerful than any old and new politics, the first or the second or the third Republic, because everything is under the jurisdiction of power judicial, there is nothing above. We don’t really live in a democracy, and we haven’t lived there for a long time – is that enough, for news? Do you need a particular day to write it?
WHAT HAPPENED
So if you want, let’s talk about today’s episode, even if none of you, as is correct, will remember all the previous episodes, drowned in time and Covid. Here it is: already expelled on June 20, Palamara had appealed and yesterday they rejected him. He only managed to make himself heard: “The confrontation with the politics of nominations has always existed,” he said, “and I repeat that decisions must be respected. I reiterate that I have never changed my role. I wish Anm a good job in the hope that it will once again be the home of all magistrates. Bravo Palamara, may the earth be light for you. Then the director of the funeral home, sorry, the president of the togas union, Luca Poniz, closed his speeches: “the Anm Palamara thinks it no longer exists, and this is a good result.” Then he referred to an interception in which Palamara himself had said that the Anm no longer counts for anything: “If you wanted to say that, after him, the Anm plays another role, not that of self-placement, I am happy.” He said it without laughing: at the funeral it is not well). Truth be told, Palamara had said something else yesterday: “I was overwhelmed, but I don’t feel morally unworthy. Until 2008 I was a clerk of acts, then my position in the political-associative life gave me another role. I lived another life, a life of representation, if I did it well or badly, I cannot say it myself.
THE MEDIATOR
Summary of the previous episodes: between 2019 and 2020, little by little, it became known about the role of mediator between currents of the Judicial Power that Palamara orchestrated, about the methods of assignment in the assignment of important positions (as chief prosecutor) and during an interview He explained verbatim: “I did not invent currents. Being identified as an absolute evil can be convenient for someone. I measured between the individual currents of the Anm. Not only was there a Palamara, there were many mediators. Many people called me, I had a representative role, I had become a figure of reference, they were all the result of an agreement ”. And again: “The positions of attorney general are places of power, it is true that the current system penalizes those who do not belong to it: denying that the currents are a shortcut is a lie The outside politician cannot affect the magistrates, but this the system favors the mixture ».
All that we had already understood thanks to the interception of his phone with the famous Trojan system. But it is the scenario of the Judicial Power in power that has turned out to be a trout, to the point that the investigations have also shaken the CSM and caused the resignation of several councilors involved. Then there is also that Palamara was investigated because he would have made his role available in exchange for trips and gifts, but ultimately it is the part that interests us the least. The investigation comes out of everything in the heart of the Judicial Power understood as a third power that overshadows the other two, of everything in the newspapers treated as pleasure dogs: and only a part of the wiretaps has been published. It is the entire judiciary that seemed to be going to trial, and it should. A whole system with errors and without reform. But the disciplinary section of the CSM, in the sham trial awaiting Palamara, admitted only 6 witnesses. The dismissal of the court order is looming, so everyone continues as before. Once a palamara is cast, another is made.
[ad_2]
