“We will not send the police home”



[ad_1]

The one of private parties it is still a responsibility. The first Minister Giuseppe Conte He wanted to return to the subject of the alleged sanctions provided for meetings between friends, family and acquaintances at home that exceed the recommended number of participants, after the fierce opposition protests on social networks.

Conte tries to quell the controversy that arose from the minister’s statements Roberto Speranza performed during the show Che Tempo che Fa.

Private parties, social storm in Hope

To a question from Fabio Fazio about the difficulty of monitoring compliance with the limit of 6 guests per party, the Health Minister said he trusted the reports of the citizens themselves.

Opposition leaders Giorgia Meloni and Matteo SalviniIn this regard, on social networks they recalled the East German Stasi and the Orwellian Memory Psychopolice.

The question of gatherings and private parties raises difficult questions about the power of the state over the private life of citizens. It is one thing to impose the use of masks when you are outside, another is what you do in the context of your private sphere.

Conte, we won’t send the police home

Speaking on the subject during a press conference, Conte wanted to reiterate that violations of the rules contained in the Dpcm on meetings will not be punishable if they are held at home.

We must improve behavior even in private homes: we must wear masks if you approach fragile people, if you receive guests. We invite you to limit the number of guests, no more than 6, and to not have parties and parties at home, these are dangerous situations. But we won’t send the police to the houses“Said the president.

The new rules on contagion, Conte said, “involve sacrifices,” but the government is determined to “a avoid a general confinement“Parties at the house can be sources of danger of contagion, but the executive has promised not to” take disproportionate measures. “

“Do not twist democracy” – reiterated Conte. “We have done everything necessary in accordance with the Constitution.”



[ad_2]